Posts in category: Amazon AWS

Amazon SageMaker Canvas now empowers enterprises to harness the full potential of their data by enabling support of petabyte-scale datasets. Starting today, you can interactively prepare large datasets, create end-to-end data flows, and invoke automated machine learning (AutoML) experiments on petabytes of data—a substantial leap from the previous 5 GB limit. With over 50 connectors, an intuitive Chat for data prep interface, and petabyte support, SageMaker Canvas provides a scalable, low-code/no-code (LCNC) ML solution for handling real-world, enterprise use cases.

Organizations often struggle to extract meaningful insights and value from their ever-growing volume of data. You need data engineering expertise and time to develop the proper scripts and pipelines to wrangle, clean, and transform data. Then you must experiment with numerous models and hyperparameters requiring domain expertise. Afterward, you need to manage complex clusters to process and train your ML models over these large-scale datasets.

Starting today, you can prepare your petabyte-scale data and explore many ML models with AutoML by chat and with a few clicks. In this post, we show you how you can complete all these steps with the new integration in SageMaker Canvas with Amazon EMR Serverless without writing code.

Solution overview

For this post, we use a sample dataset of a 33 GB CSV file containing flight purchase transactions from Expedia between April 16, 2022, and October 5, 2022. We use the features to predict the base fare of a ticket based on the flight date, distance, seat type, and others.

In the following sections, we demonstrate how to import and prepare the data, optionally export the data, create a model, and run inference, all in SageMaker Canvas.

Prerequisites

You can follow along by completing the following prerequisites:

1. Set up SageMaker Canvas.
2. Download the dataset from Kaggle and upload it to an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket.
3. Add emr-serverless as a trusted entity to the SageMaker Canvas execution role to allow Amazon EMR processing jobs.

Import data in SageMaker Canvas

We start by importing the data from Amazon S3 using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler in SageMaker Canvas. Complete the following steps:

1. In SageMaker Canvas, choose Data Wrangler in the navigation pane.
2. On the Data flows tab, choose Tabular on the Import and prepare dropdown menu.
   
3. Enter the S3 URI for the file and choose Go, then choose Next.
4. Give your dataset a name, choose Random for Sampling method, then choose Import.
   

Importing data from the SageMaker Data Wrangler flow allows you to interact with a sample of the data before scaling the data preparation flow to the full dataset. This improves time and performance because you don’t need to work with the entirety of the data during preparation. You can later use EMR Serverless to handle the heavy lifting. When SageMaker Data Wrangler finishes importing, you can start transforming the dataset.

After you import the dataset, you can first look at the Data Quality Insights Report to see recommendations from SageMaker Canvas on how to improve the data quality and therefore improve the model’s performance.

5. In the flow, choose the options menu (three dots) for the node, then choose Get data insights.
   
6. Give your analysis a name, select Regression for Problem type, choose baseFare for Target column, select Sampled dataset for Data Size, then choose Create.
   

Assessing the data quality and analyzing the report’s findings is often the first step because it can guide the proceeding data preparation steps. Within the report, you will find dataset statistics, high priority warnings around target leakage, skewness, anomalies, and a feature summary.

Prepare the data with SageMaker Canvas

Now that you understand your dataset characteristics and potential issues, you can use the Chat for data prep feature in SageMaker Canvas to simplify data preparation with natural language prompts. This generative artificial intelligence (AI)-powered capability reduces the time, effort, and expertise required for the often complex tasks of data preparation.

2. Choose the .flow file on the top banner to go back to your flow canvas.
   
3. Choose the options menu for the node, then choose Chat for data prep.
   

For our first example, converting searchDate and flightDate to datetime format might help us perform date manipulations and extract useful features such as year, month, day, and the difference in days between searchDate and flightDate. These features can find temporal patterns in the data that can influence the baseFare.

3. Provide a prompt like “Convert searchDate and flightDate to datetime format” to view the code and choose Add to steps.
   

In addition to data preparation using the chat UI, you can use LCNC transforms with the SageMaker Data Wrangler UI to transform your data. For example, we use one-hot encoding as a technique to convert categorical data into numerical format using the LCNC interface.

4. Add the transform Encode categorical.
5. Choose One-hot encode for Transform and add the following columns: startingAirport, destinationAirport, fareBasisCode, segmentsArrivalAirportCode, segmentsDepartureAirportCode, segmentsAirlineName, segmentsAirlineCode, segmentsEquipmentDescription, and segmentsCabinCode.

You can use the advanced search and filter option in SageMaker Canvas to select columns that are of String data type to simplify the process.

Refer to the SageMaker Canvas blog for other examples using SageMaker Data Wrangler. For this post, we simplify our efforts with these two steps, but we encourage you to use both chat and transforms to add data preparation steps on your own. In our testing, we successfully ran all our data preparation steps through the chat using the following prompts as an example:

• “Add another step that extracts relevant features such as year, month, day, and day of the week which can enhance temporality to our dataset”
• “Have Canvas convert the travelDuration, segmentsDurationInSeconds, and segmentsDistance column from string to numeric”
• “Handle missing values by imputing the mean for the totalTravelDistance column, and replacing missing values as ‘Unknown’ for the segmentsEquipmentDescription column”
• “Convert boolean columns isBasicEconomy, isRefundable, and isNonStop to integer format (0 and 1)”
• “Scale numerical features like totalFare, seatsRemaining, totalTravelDistance using Standard Scaler from scikit-learn”

When these steps are complete, you can move to the next step of processing the full dataset and creating a model.

(Optional) Export your data in Amazon S3 using an EMR Serverless job

You can process the entire 33 GB dataset by running the data flow using EMR Serverless for the data preparation job without worrying about the infrastructure.

1. From the last node in the flow diagram, choose Export and Export data to Amazon S3.
   
2. Provide a dataset name and output location.
3. It is recommended to keep Auto job configuration selected unless you want to change any of the Amazon EMR or SageMaker Processing configs. (If your data is greater than 5 GB data processing will run in EMR Serverless, otherwise it will run within the SageMaker Canvas workspace.)
4. Under EMR Serverless, provide a job name and choose Export.
   

You can view the job status in SageMaker Canvas on the Data Wrangler page on the Jobs tab.

You can also view the job status on the Amazon EMR Studio console by choosing Applications under Serverless in the navigation pane.

Create a model

You can also create a model at the end of your flow.

1. Choose Create model from the node options, and SageMaker Canvas will create a dataset and then navigate you to create a model.
2. Provide a dataset and model name, select Predictive analysis for Problem type, choose baseFare as the target column, then choose Export and create model.

The model creation process will take a couple of minutes to complete.

3. Choose My Models in the navigation pane.
4. Choose the model you just exported and navigate to version 1.
5. Under Model type, choose Configure model.
6. Select Numeric model type, then choose Save.
7. On the dropdown menu, choose Quick Build to start the build process.
   

When the build is complete, on the Analyze page, you can the following tabs:

• Overview – This gives you a general overview of the model’s performance, depending on the model type.
• Scoring – This shows visualizations that you can use to get more insights into your model’s performance beyond the overall accuracy metrics.
• Advanced metrics – This contains your model’s scores for advanced metrics and additional information that can give you a deeper understanding of your model’s performance. You can also view information such as the column impacts.

Run inference

In this section, we walk through the steps to run batch predictions against the generated dataset.

1. On the Analyze page, choose Predict.
2. To generate predictions on your test dataset, choose Manual.
3. Select the test dataset you created and choose Generate predictions.
   
4. When the predictions are ready, either choose View in the pop-up message at the bottom of the page or navigate to the Status column to choose Preview on the options menu (three dots).
   

You’re now able to review the predictions.

You have now used the generative AI data preparation capabilities in SageMaker Canvas to prepare a large dataset, trained a model using AutoML techniques, and run batch predictions at scale. All of this was done with a few clicks and using a natural language interface.

Clean up

To avoid incurring future session charges, log out of SageMaker Canvas. To log out, choose Log out in the navigation pane of the SageMaker Canvas application.

When you log out of SageMaker Canvas, your models and datasets aren’t affected, but SageMaker Canvas cancels any Quick build tasks. If you log out of SageMaker Canvas while running a Quick build, your build might be interrupted until you relaunch the application. When you relaunch, SageMaker Canvas automatically restarts the build. Standard builds continue even if you log out.

Conclusion

The introduction of petabyte-scale AutoML support within SageMaker Canvas marks a significant milestone in the democratization of ML. By combining the power of generative AI, AutoML, and the scalability of EMR Serverless, we’re empowering organizations of all sizes to unlock insights and drive business value from even the largest and most complex datasets.

The benefits of ML are no longer confined to the domain of highly specialized experts. SageMaker Canvas is revolutionizing the way businesses approach data and AI, putting the power of predictive analytics and data-driven decision-making into the hands of everyone. Explore the future of no-code ML with SageMaker Canvas today.

About the authors

Bret Pontillo is a Sr. Solutions Architect at AWS. He works closely with enterprise customers building data lakes and analytical applications on the AWS platform. In his free time, Bret enjoys traveling, watching sports, and trying new restaurants.

Polaris Jhandi is a Cloud Application Architect with AWS Professional Services. He has a background in AI/ML & big data. He is currently working with customers to migrate their legacy Mainframe applications to the Cloud.

Peter Chung is a Solutions Architect serving enterprise customers at AWS. He loves to help customers use technology to solve business problems on various topics like cutting costs and leveraging artificial intelligence. He wrote a book on AWS FinOps, and enjoys reading and building solutions.

Read More

QnABot on AWS (an AWS Solution) now provides access to Amazon Bedrock foundational models (FMs) and Knowledge Bases for Amazon Bedrock, a fully managed end-to-end Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) workflow. You can now provide contextual information from your private data sources that can be used to create rich, contextual, conversational experiences.

The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) provides organizations unique opportunities to digitally transform customer experiences. Enterprises with contact center operations are looking to improve customer satisfaction by providing self-service, conversational, interactive chat bots that have natural language understanding (NLU). Enterprises want to automate frequently asked transactional questions, provide a friendly conversational interface, and improve operational efficiency. In turn, customers can ask a variety of questions and receive accurate answers powered by generative AI.

In this post, we discuss how to use QnABot on AWS to deploy a fully functional chatbot integrated with other AWS services, and delight your customers with human agent like conversational experiences.

Solution overview

QnABot on AWS is an AWS Solution that enterprises can use to enable a multi-channel, multi-language chatbot with NLU to improve end customer experiences. QnABot provides a flexible, tiered conversational interface empowering enterprises to meet customers where they are and provide accurate responses. Some responses need to be exact (for example, regulated industries like healthcare or capital markets), some responses need to be searched from large, indexed data sources and cited, and some answers need to be generated on the fly, conversationally, based on semantic context. With QnABot on AWS, you can achieve all of the above by deploying the solution using an AWS CloudFormation template, with no coding required. The solution is extensible, uses AWS AI and machine learning (ML) services, and integrates with multiple channels such as voice, web, and text (SMS).

QnABot on AWS provides access to multiple FMs through Amazon Bedrock, so you can create conversational interfaces based on your customers’ language needs (such as Spanish, English, or French), sophistication of questions, and accuracy of responses based on user intent. You now have the capability to access various large language models (LLMs) from leading AI enterprises (such as Amazon Titan, Anthropic Claude 3, Cohere Command, Meta Llama 3, Mistal AI Large Model, and others on Amazon Bedrock) to find a model best suited for your use case. Additionally, native integration with Knowledge Bases for Amazon Bedrock allows you to retrieve specific, relevant data from your data sources via pre-built data source connectors (Amazon Simple Storage Service – S3, Confluence, Microsoft SharePoint, Salesforce, or web crawlers), and automatically converted to text embeddings stored in a vector database of your choice. You can then retrieve your company-specific information with source attribution (such as citations) to improve transparency and minimize hallucinations. Lastly, if you don’t want to set up custom integrations with large data sources, you can simply upload your documents and support multi-turn conversations. With prompt engineering, managed RAG workflows, and access to multiple FMs, you can provide your customers rich, human agent-like experiences with precise answers.

Deploying the QnABot solution builds the following environment in the AWS Cloud.

Figure 1: QnABot Architecture Diagram

The high-level process flow for the solution components deployed with the CloudFormation template is as follows:

1. The admin deploys the solution into their AWS account, opens the Content Designer UI or Amazon Lex web client, and uses Amazon Cognito to authenticate.
2. After authentication, Amazon API Gateway and Amazon S3 deliver the contents of the Content Designer UI.
3. The admin configures questions and answers in the Content Designer and the UI sends requests to API Gateway to save the questions and answers.
4. The Content Designer AWS Lambda function saves the input in Amazon OpenSearch Service in a questions bank index. If using text embeddings, these requests first pass through a LLM model hosted on Amazon Bedrock or Amazon SageMaker to generate embeddings before being saved into the question bank on OpenSearch Service.
5. Users of the chatbot interact with Amazon Lex through the web client UI, Amazon Alexa, or Amazon Connect.
6. Amazon Lex forwards requests to the Bot Fulfillment Lambda function. Users can also send requests to this Lambda function through Amazon Alexa devices.
7. The user and chat information is stored in Amazon DynamoDB to disambiguate follow-up questions from previous question and answer context.
8. The Bot Fulfillment Lambda function takes the user’s input and uses Amazon Comprehend and Amazon Translate (if necessary) to translate non-native language requests to the native language selected by the user during the deployment, and then looks up the answer in OpenSearch Service. If using LLM features such as text generation and text embeddings, these requests first pass through various LLM models hosted on Amazon Bedrock or SageMaker to generate the search query and embeddings to compare with those saved in the question bank on OpenSearch Service.
9. If no match is returned from the OpenSearch Service question bank, then the Bot Fulfillment Lambda function forwards the request as follows:
   1. If an Amazon Kendra index is configured for fallback, then the Bot Fulfillment Lambda function forwards the request to Amazon Kendra if no match is returned from the OpenSearch Service question bank. The text generation LLM can optionally be used to create the search query and synthesize a response from the returned document excerpts.
   2. If a knowledge base ID is configured, the Bot Fulfillment Lambda function forwards the request to the knowledge base. The Bot Fulfillment Lambda function uses the RetrieveAndGenerate API to fetch the relevant results for a user query, augment the FM’s prompt, and return the response.
10. User interactions with the Bot Fulfillment function generate logs and metrics data, which is sent to Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose and then to Amazon S3 for later data analysis.
11. OpenSearch Dashboards can be used to view usage history, logged utterances, no hits utterances, positive user feedback, and negative user feedback, and also provides the ability to create custom reports.

Prerequisites

To get started, you need the following:

• An AWS account
• An active deployment of QnABot on AWS (version 6.0.0 or later)
• Amazon Bedrock model access (required) for all embeddings and LLM models that will be used in QnABot

Figure 2: Request Access to Bedrock Foundational Models (FMs)

• The Amazon Bedrock knowledge base ID (create a knowledge base in Amazon Bedrock if you want to chat with your documents)

In the following sections, we explore some of QnABot’s generative AI features.

Semantic question matching using an embeddings LLM

QnABot on AWS can use text embeddings to provide semantic search capabilities by using LLMs. The goal of this feature is to improve question matching accuracy while reducing the amount of tuning required when compared to the default OpenSearch Service keyword-based matching.

Some of the benefits include:

• Improved FAQ accuracy from semantic matching vs. keyword matching (comparing the meaning vs. comparing individual words)
• Fewer training utterances required to match a diverse set of queries
• Better multi-language support, because translated utterances only need to match the meaning of the stored text, not the wording

Configure Amazon Bedrock to enable semantic question matching

To enable these expanded semantic search capabilities, QnABot uses an Amazon Bedrock FM to generate text embeddings provided using the EmbeddingsBedrockModelId CloudFormation stack parameter. These models provide the best performance and operate on a pay-per-request model. At the time of writing, the following embeddings models are supported by QnABot on AWS:

• Amazon Titan Embeddings G1
• Cohere English
• Cohere Multilingual

For the CloudFormation stack, set the following parameters:

• Set EmbeddingsAPI to BEDROCK
• Set EmbeddingsBedrockModelId to one of the available options

For example, with semantic matching enabled, the question “What’s the address of the White House?” matches to “Where does the President live?” This example doesn’t match using keywords because they don’t share any of the same words.

Figure 3: Semantic matching in QnABot

In the UI designer, you can set ENABLE_DEBUG_RESPONSE to true to see the user input, source, or any errors of the answer, as illustrated in the preceding screenshot.

You can also evaluate the matching score on the TEST tab in the content designer UI. In this example, we add a match on “qna item question” with the question “Where does the President live?”

Figure 4: Test and evaluate answers in QnABot

Similarly, you can try a match on “item text passage” with the question “Where did Humpty Dumpty sit?”

Figure 5: Match items or text passages in QnABot

Recommendations for tuning with an embeddings LLM

When using embeddings in QnABot, we recommend generalizing questions because more user utterances will match a general statement. For example, the embeddings LLM model will cluster “checking” and “savings” with “account,” so if you want to match both account types, use “account” in your questions.

Similarly, for the question and utterance of “transfer to an agent,” consider using “transfer to someone” because it will better match with “agent,” “representative,” “human,” “person,” and so on.

In addition, we recommend tuning EMBEDDINGS_SCORE_THRESHOLD, EMBEDDINGS_SCORE_ANSWER_THRESHOLD, and EMBEDDINGS_TEXT_PASSAGE_SCORE_THRESHOLD based on the scores. The default values are generalized to all multiple models, but you might need to modify this based on embeddings model and your experiments.

Text generation and query disambiguation using a text LLM

QnABot on AWS can use LLMs to provide a richer, more conversational chat experience. The goal of these features is to minimize the amount of individually curated answers administrators are required to maintain, improve question matching accuracy by providing query disambiguation, and enable the solution to provide more concise answers to users, especially when using a knowledge base in Amazon Bedrock or the Amazon Kendra fallback feature.

Configure an Amazon Bedrock FM with AWS CloudFormation

To enable these capabilities, QnABot uses one of the Amazon Bedrock FMs to generate text embeddings provided using the LLMBedrockModelId CloudFormation stack parameter. These models provide the best performance and operate on a pay-per-request model.

For the CloudFormation stack, set the following parameters:

• Set LLMApi to BEDROCK
• Set LLMBedrockModelId to one of the available LLM options

Figure 6: Setup QnABot to use Bedrock FMs

Query disambiguation (LLM-generated query)

By using an LLM, QnABot can take the user’s chat history and generate a standalone question for the current utterance. This enables users to ask follow-up questions that on their own may not be answerable without context of the conversation. The new disambiguated, or standalone, question can then be used as search queries to retrieve the best FAQ, passage, or Amazon Kendra match.

In QnABot’s Content Designer, you can further customize the prompt and model listed in the Query Matching section:

• LLM_GENERATE_QUERY_PROMPT_TEMPLATE – The prompt template used to construct a prompt for the LLM to disambiguate a follow-up question. The template may use the following placeholders:
  • history – A placeholder for the last LLM_CHAT_HISTORY_MAX_MESSAGES messages in the conversational history, to provide conversational context.
  • input – A placeholder for the current user utterance or question.
• LLM_GENERATE_QUERY_MODEL_PARAMS – The parameters sent to the LLM model when disambiguating follow-up questions. Refer to the relevant model documentation for additional values that the model provider accepts.

The following screenshot shows an example with the new LLM disambiguation feature enabled, given the chat history context after answering “Who was Little Bo Peep” and the follow-up question “Did she find them again?”

Figure 7: LLM query disambiguation feature enabled

QnABot rewrites that question to provide all the context required to search for the relevant FAQ or passage: “Did Little Bo Peep find her lost sheep again?”

Figure 8: With query disambiguation with LLMs, context is maintained

Answer text generation using QnABot

You can now generate answers to questions from context provided by knowledge base search results, or from text passages created or imported directly into QnABot. This allows you to generate answers that reduce the number of FAQs you have to maintain, because you can now synthesize concise answers from your existing documents in a knowledge base, Amazon Kendra index, or document passages stored in QnABot as text items. Additionally, your generated answers can be concise and therefore suitable for voice or contact center chatbots, website bots, and SMS bots. Lastly, these generated answers are compatible with the solution’s multi-language support—customers can interact in their chosen languages and receive generated answers in the same language.

With QnABot, you can use two different data sources to generate responses: text passages or a knowledge base in Amazon Bedrock.

Generate answers to questions from text passages

In the content designer web interface, administrators can store full text passages for QnABot on AWS to use. When a question gets asked that matches against this passage, the solution can use LLMs to answer the user’s question based on information found within the passage. We highly recommend you use this option with semantic question matching using Amazon Bedrock text embedding. In QnABot content designer, you can further customize the prompt and model listed under Text Generation using the General Settings section.

Let’s look at a text passage example:

1. In the Content Designer, choose Add.
2. Select the text, enter an item ID and a passage, and choose Create.

You can also import your passages from a JSON file using the Content Designer Import feature. On the tools menu, choose Import, open Examples/Extensions, and choose LOAD next to TextPassage-NurseryRhymeExamples to import two nursery rhyme text items.

The following example shows QnABot generating an answer using a text passage item that contains the nursery rhyme, in response to the question “Where did Humpty Dumpty sit?”

Figure 9: Generate answers from text passages

You can also use query disambiguation and text generation together, by asking “Who tried to fix Humpty Dumpty?” and the follow-up question “Did they succeed?”

Figure 10: Text generation with query disambiguation to maintain context

You can also modify LLM_QA_PROMPT_TEMPLATE in the Content Designer to answer in different languages. In the prompt, you can specify the prompt and answers in different languages (e.g. prompts in French, Spanish).

Figure 11: Answer in different languages

You can also specify answers in two languages with bulleted points.

Figure 12: Answer in multiple languages

RAG using an Amazon Bedrock knowledge base

By integrating with a knowledge base, QnABot on AWS can generate concise answers to users’ questions from configured data sources. This prevents the need for users to sift through larger text passages to find the answer. You can also create your own knowledge base from files stored in an S3 bucket. Amazon Bedrock knowledge bases with QnABot don’t require EmbeddingsApi and LLMApi because the embeddings and generative response are already provided by the knowledge base. To enable this option, create an Amazon Bedrock knowledge base and use your knowledge base ID for the CloudFormation stack parameter BedrockKnowledgeBaseId.

To configure QnABot to use the knowledge base, refer to Create a knowledge base. The following is a quick setup guide to get started:

1. Provide your knowledge base details.

Figure 13: Setup Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Base for RAG use cases

2. Configure your data source based on the available options. For this example, we use Amazon S3 as the data source and note that the bucket has to be prepended with qna or QNA.

Figure 14: Setup your RAG data sources for Amazon Knowledge Base

3. Upload your documents to Amazon S3. For this example, we uploaded the aws-overview.pdf whitepaper to test integration.
4. Create or choose your vector database store to allow Bedrock to store, update and manage embeddings.
5. Sync the data source and use your knowledge base ID for the CloudFormation stack parameter BedrockKnowledgeBaseId.

Figure 15: Complete setting up Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Base for your RAG use cases

In QnABot Content Designer, you can customize additional settings list under Text Generation using RAG with the Amazon Bedrock knowledge base.

QnABot on AWS can now answer questions from the AWS whitepapers, such as “What services are available in AWS for container orchestration?” and “Are there any upfront fees with ECS?”

Figure 16: Generate answers from your Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Base (RAG)

Conclusion

Customers expect quick and efficient service from enterprises in today’s fast-paced world. But providing excellent customer experience can be significantly challenging when the volume of inquiries outpaces the human resources employed to address them. Companies of all sizes can use QnABot on AWS with built-in Amazon Bedrock integrations to provide access to many market leading FMs, provide specialized lookup needs using RAG to reduce hallucinations, and provide a friendly AI conversational experience. With QnABot on AWS, you can provide high-quality natural text conversations, content management, and multi-turn dialogues. The solution comes with one-click deployment for custom implementation, a content designer for Q&A management, and rich reporting. You can also integrate with contact center systems like Amazon Connect and Genesys Cloud CX. Get started with QnABot on AWS.

About the Author

Ajay Swamy is the Product Leader for Data, ML and Generative AI AWS Solutions. He specializes in building AWS Solutions (production-ready software packages) that deliver compelling value to customers by solving for their unique business needs. Other than QnABot on AWS, he manages Generative AI Application Builder, Enhanced Document Understanding, Discovering Hot Topics using Machine Learning and other AWS Solutions. He lives with his wife and dog (Figaro), in New York, NY.

Abhishek Patil is a Software Development Engineer at Amazon Web Services (AWS) based in Atlanta, GA, USA. With over 7 years of experience in the tech industry, he specializes in building distributed software systems, with a primary focus on Generative AI and Machine Learning. Abhishek is a primary builder on AI solution QnABot on AWS and has contributed to other AWS Solutions including Discovering Hot Topics using Machine Learning and OSDU® Data Platform. Outside of work, Abhishek enjoys spending time outdoors, reading, resistance training, and practicing yoga.

Read More

Amazon Q Business is a fully managed, generative artificial intelligence (AI)-powered assistant that helps enterprises unlock the value of their data and knowledge. With Amazon Q, you can quickly find answers to questions, generate summaries and content, and complete tasks by using the information and expertise stored across your company’s various data sources and enterprise systems. At the core of this capability are native data source connectors that seamlessly integrate and index content from multiple repositories into a unified index. This enables the Amazon Q large language model (LLM) to provide accurate, well-written answers by drawing from the consolidated data and information. The data source connectors act as a bridge, synchronizing content from disparate systems like Salesforce, Jira, and SharePoint into a centralized index that powers the natural language understanding and generative abilities of Amazon Q.

Customers appreciate that Amazon Q Business securely connects to over 40 data sources. While using their data source, they want better visibility into the document processing lifecycle during data source sync jobs. They want to know the status of each document they attempted to crawl and index, as well as the ability to troubleshoot why certain documents were not returned with the expected answers. Additionally, they want access to metadata, timestamps, and access control lists (ACLs) for the indexed documents.

We are pleased to announce a new feature now available in Amazon Q Business that significantly improves visibility into data source sync operations. The latest release introduces a comprehensive document-level report incorporated into the sync history, providing administrators with granular indexing status, metadata, and ACL details for every document processed during a data source sync job. This enhancement to sync job observability enables administrators to quickly investigate and resolve ingestion or access issues encountered while setting up an Amazon Q Business application. The detailed document reports are persisted in the new SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT log stream under the Amazon Q Business application log group, so critical sync job details are available on-demand when troubleshooting.

Lifecycle of a document in a data source sync run job

In this section, we examine the lifecycle of a document within a data source sync in Amazon Q Business. This provides valuable insight into the sync process. The data source sync comprises three key stages: crawling, syncing, and indexing. Crawling involves the connector connecting to the data source and extracting documents meeting the defined sync scope according to the data source configuration. These documents are then synced to Amazon Q Business during the syncing phase. Finally, indexing makes the synced documents searchable within the Amazon Q Business environment.

The following diagram shows a flowchart of a sync run job.

Crawling stage

The first stage is the crawling stage, where the connector crawls all documents and their metadata from the data source. During this stage, the connector also compares the checksum of the document against the Amazon Q index to figure out if a particular document needs to be added, modified, or deleted from the index. This operation corresponds to the CrawlAction field in the sync run history report.

If the document is unmodified, it is marked as UNMODIFIED and skipped in the rest of the stages. If any document fails in the crawling stage, for example due to throttling errors, broken content, or if the document size is too big, that document is marked as failed in the sync run history report with the CrawlStatus as FAILED. If the document was skipped due to any validation errors, its CrawlStatus is marked as SKIPPED. These documents are not sent forward to the next stage. All successful documents are marked as SUCCESS and are sent forward.

We also capture the ACLs and metadata on each document in this stage to be able to add it to the sync run history report.

Syncing stage

During the syncing stage, the document is sent to Amazon Q Business ingestion service APIs like BatchPutDocument and BatchDeleteDocument. After a document is submitted to these APIs, Amazon Q Business runs validation checks on the submitted documents. If any document fails these checks, its SyncStatus is marked as FAILED. If there is an irrecoverable error for a particular document, it is marked as SKIPPED and other documents are sent forward.

Indexing stage

In this step, Amazon Q Business parses the document, processes it according to its content type, and persists it in the index. If the document fails to be persisted, its IndexStatus is marked as FAILED; otherwise, it is marked as SUCCESS.

After the statuses of all the stages have been captured, we emit these statuses as an Amazon Cloudwatch event to the customer’s AWS account.

Key features and benefits of document-level reports

The following are the key features and benefits of the new document level report in Amazon Q Business applications:

• Enhanced sync run history page – A new Actions column has been added to the sync run history page, providing access to the document-level report for each sync run.
  
• Dedicated log stream – A new log stream named SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT has been created in the Amazon Q Business CloudWatch log group, containing the document-level report.
  
• Comprehensive document information – The document-level report includes the following information for each document.
• Document ID – This is the document ID that is inherited directly from the data source or mapped by the customer in the data source field mappings.
• Document title – The title of the document is taken from the data source or mapped by the customer in the data source field mappings.
• Consolidated document status (SUCCESS, FAILED, or SKIPPED) – This is the final consolidated status of the document. It can have a value of SUCCESS, FAILED, or SKIPPED. If the document was successfully processed in all stages, then the value is SUCCESS. If the document has failed or was skipped in any of the stages, then the value of this field will be FAILED or SKIPPED.
• Error message (if the document failed) – This field contains the error message with which a document failed. If a document was skipped due to throttling errors, or any internal errors, this will be shown in the error message field.
• Crawl status – This field denotes whether the document was crawled successfully from the data source. This status correlates to the syncing-crawling state in the data source sync.
• Sync status – This field denotes whether the document was sent for syncing successfully. This correlates to the syncing-indexing state in the data source sync.
• Index status – This field denotes whether the document was successfully persisted in the index.
• ACLs – This field contains a list of document-level permissions that were crawled from the data source. The details of each element in the list are:
  • Global name: This is the email/username of the user. This field is mapped across multiple data sources. For example, if a user has 3 data sources – Confluence, Sharepoint and Gmail with the local user ID as confluence_user, sharepoint_user and gmail_user respectively, and their email address user@email.com is the globalName in the ACL for all of them; then Amazon Q Business understands that all of these local user IDs map to the same global name.
  • Name: This is the local unique ID of the user which is assigned by the data source.
  • Type: This field indicates the principal type. This can be either USER or GROUP.
  • Is Federated: This is a boolean flag which indicates whether the group is of INDEX level (true) or DATASOURCE level (false).
  • Access: This field indicates whether the user has access allowed or denied explicitly. Values can be either ALLOWED or DENIED.
  • Data source ID: This is the data source ID. For federated groups (INDEX level), this field will be null.
• Metadata – This field contains the metadata fields (other than ACL) that were pulled from the data source. This list also includes the metadata fields mapped by the customer in the data source field mappings as well as extra metadata fields added by the connector.
• Hashed document ID (for troubleshooting assistance) – To safeguard your data privacy, we present a secure, one-way hash of the document identifier. This encrypted value enables the Amazon Q Business team to efficiently locate and analyze the specific document within our logs, should you encounter any issue that requires further investigation and resolution.
• Timestamp – The timestamp indicates when the document status was logged in CloudWatch.

In the following sections, we explore different use cases for the logging feature.

Troubleshoot “Sorry, I could not find relevant information” with the new logging feature

The new document-level logging feature in Amazon Q Business can help troubleshoot common issues related to the “Sorry, I could not find relevant information to complete your request” response.

Let’s explore an example scenario. A mutual funds manager uses Amazon Q Business chat for knowledge retrieval and insights extraction across their enterprise data stores. When the fund manager asks, “What is the CAGR of the multi-asset fund?” in the Amazon Q chat, they receive the “Sorry, I could not find relevant information to complete your request” response.

As the administrator managing their Amazon Q Business application, you can troubleshoot the issue using the following approach with the new logging feature. First, you want to determine whether the multi-asset fund document was successfully indexed in the Amazon Q Business application. Next, you need to verify if the fund manager’s user account has the required permission to read the information from the multi-asset fund document. Amazon Q Business enforces the document permissions configured in its data source, and you can use this new feature to verify that the document ACL settings are synced in the Amazon Q Business application index.

You can use the following CloudWatch query string to check the document ACL settings:

filter @logStream like 'SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT/' 
and DocumentTitle = "your-document-title"
| fields DocumentTitle, ConnectorDocumentStatus.Status, Acl
| sort @timestamp desc
| limit 1

This query filter uses the per-document-level logging stream SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT, and displays the document title and its associated ACL settings. By verifying the document indexing and permissions, you can identify and resolve potential issues that may be causing the “Sorry, I could not find relevant information” response.

The following screenshot shows an example result.

Determine the optimal boosting duration for recent documents in using document-level reporting

When it comes to generating accurate answers, you may want to fine-tune the way Amazon Q prioritizes its content. For instance, you may prefer to boost recent documents over older ones to make sure the most up-to-date passages are used to generate an answer. To achieve this, you can use the business’s relevance tuning feature in Amazon Q Business to boost documents based on the last update date attribute, with a specified boosting duration. However, determining the optimal boosting period can be challenging when dealing with a large number of frequently changing documents.

You can now use the per-document-level report to obtain the _last_updated_at metadata field information for your documents, which can help you determine the appropriate boosting period. For this, you use the following CloudWatch Logs Insights query to retrieve the _last_updated_at metadata attribute for machine learning documents from the SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT log stream:

filter @logStream like 'SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT/' 
and Metadata like 'Machine Learning'
| parse Metadata '{"key":"_last_updated_at","value":{"dateValue":"*"}}' as @last_updated_at
| sort @last_updated_at desc, @timestamp desc
| dedup DocumentTitle

With the preceding query, you can gain insights into the last updated timestamps of your documents, enabling you to make informed decisions about the optimal boosting period. This approach makes sure your chat responses are generated using the most recent and relevant information, enhancing the overall accuracy and effectiveness of your Amazon Q Business implementation.

The following screenshot shows an example result.

Common document indexing observability and troubleshooting methods

In this section, we explore some common admin tasks for observing and troubleshooting document indexing using the new document-level reporting feature.

List all successfully indexed documents from a data source

To retrieve a list of all documents that have been successfully indexed from a specific data source, you can use the following CloudWatch query:

fields DocumentTitle, DocumentId, @timestamp
| filter @logStream like 'SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT/your-data-source-id/'
and ConnectorDocumentStatus.Status = "SUCCESS"
| sort @timestamp desc | dedup DocumentTitle, DocumentId

The following screenshot shows an example result. 

List all successfully indexed documents from a data source sync job

To retrieve a list of all documents that have been successfully indexed during a specific sync job, you can use the following CloudWatch query:

fields DocumentTitle, DocumentId, ConnectorDocumentStatus.Status AS IndexStatus, @timestamp
| filter @logStream like 'SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT/your-data-source-id/run-id'
and ConnectorDocumentStatus.Status = "SUCCESS"
| sort DocumentTitle

The following screenshot shows an example result.

List all failed indexed documents from a data source sync job

To retrieve a list of all documents that failed to index during a specific sync job, along with the error messages, you can use the following CloudWatch query:

fields DocumentTitle, DocumentId, ConnectorDocumentStatus.Status AS IndexStatus, ErrorMsg, @timestamp
| filter @logStream like 'SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT/your-data-source-id/run-id'
and ConnectorDocumentStatus.Status = "FAILED"
| sort @timestamp desc

The following screenshot shows an example result.

List all documents that contains a particular user name ACL permission from an Amazon Q Business application

To retrieve a list of documents that have a specific user’s ACL permission, you can use the following CloudWatch Logs Insights query:

filter @logStream like 'SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT/' 
and Acl like 'aneesh@mydemoaws.onmicrosoft.com'
| display DocumentTitle, SourceUri

The following screenshot shows an example result.

 List the ACL of an indexed document from a data source sync job

To retrieve the ACL information for a specific indexed document from a sync job, you can use the following CloudWatch Logs Insights query:

filter @logStream like 'SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT/data-source-id/run-id' 
and DocumentTitle = "your-document-title"
| display DocumentTitle, Acl

The following screenshot shows an example result.

List metadata of an indexed document from a data source sync job

To retrieve the metadata information for a specific indexed document from a sync job, you can use the following CloudWatch Logs Insights query:

filter @logStream like 'SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT/data-source-id/run-id' 
and DocumentTitle = "your-document-title"
| display DocumentTitle, Metadata

The following screenshot shows an example result.

Conclusion

The newly introduced document-level report in Amazon Q Business provides enhanced visibility and observability into the document processing lifecycle during data source sync jobs. This feature addresses a critical need expressed by customers for better troubleshooting capabilities and access to detailed information about the indexing status, metadata, and ACLs of individual documents.

The document-level report is stored in a dedicated log stream named SYNC_RUN_HISTORY_REPORT within the Amazon Q Business application CloudWatch log group. This report contains comprehensive information for each document, including the document ID, title, overall document sync status, error messages (if any), along with its ACLs, and metadata information retrieved from the data sources. The data source sync run history page now includes an Actions column, providing access to the document-level report for each sync run. This feature significantly improves the ability to troubleshoot issues related to document ingestion and access control, and issues related to metadata relevance, and provides better visibility about the documents synced with an Amazon Q index.

To get started with Amazon Q Business, explore the Getting started guide. To learn more about data source connectors and best practices, see Configuring Amazon Q Business data source connectors.

About the authors

Aneesh Mohan is a Senior Solutions Architect at Amazon Web Services (AWS), bringing two decades of experience in creating impactful solutions for business-critical workloads. He is passionate about technology and loves working with customers to build well-architected solutions, focusing on the financial services industry, AI/ML, security, and data technologies.

Ashwin Shukla is a Software Development Engineer II on the Amazon Q for Business and Amazon Kendra engineering team, with 6 years of experience in developing enterprise software. In this role, he works on designing and developing foundational features for Amazon Q for Business.

Read More

Effective customer support, project management, and knowledge management are critical aspects of providing efficient customer relationship management. ServiceNow is a platform for incident tracking, knowledge management, and project management functions for software projects and has become an indispensable part of many organizations’ workflows to ensure success of the customer and the product. However, extracting valuable insights from the vast amount of data stored in ServiceNow often requires manual effort and building specialized tooling. Users such as support engineers, project managers, and product managers need to be able to ask questions about an incident or a customer, or get answers from knowledge articles in order to provide excellent customer support. Organizations use ServiceNow to manage workflows, such as IT services, ticketing systems, configuration management, and infrastructure changes across IT systems. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) provides the ability to take relevant information from a data source such as ServiceNow and provide well-constructed answers back to the user.

Building a generative AI-based conversational application integrated with relevant data sources requires an enterprise to invest time, money, and people. First, you need to build connectors to the data sources. Next, you need to index this data to make it available for a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approach, where relevant passages are delivered with high accuracy to a large language model (LLM). To do this, you need to select an index that provides the capabilities to index the content for semantic and vector search, build the infrastructure to retrieve and rank the answers, and build a feature-rich web application. Additionally, you need to hire and staff a large team to build, maintain, and manage such a system.

Amazon Q Business is a fully managed generative AI-powered assistant that can answer questions, provide summaries, generate content, and securely complete tasks based on data and information in your enterprise systems. Amazon Q Business can help you get fast, relevant answers to pressing questions, solve problems, generate content, and take action using the data and expertise found in your company’s information repositories, code, and enterprise systems (such as ServiceNow, among others). Amazon Q provides out-of-the-box native data source connectors that can index content into a built-in retriever and uses an LLM to provide accurate, well-written answers. A data source connector is a component of Amazon Q that helps integrate and synchronize data from multiple repositories into one index.

Amazon Q Business offers multiple prebuilt connectors to a large number of data sources, including ServiceNow, Atlassian Confluence, Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), Microsoft SharePoint, Salesforce, and many more, and helps you create your generative AI solution with minimal configuration. For a full list of Amazon Q business supported data source connectors, see Amazon Q Business connectors.

You can use the Amazon Q Business ServiceNow Online data source connector to connect to the ServiceNow Online platform and index ServiceNow entities such as knowledge articles, Service Catalogs, and incident entries, along with the metadata and document access control lists (ACLs).

This post shows how to configure the Amazon Q ServiceNow connector to index your ServiceNow platform and take advantage of generative AI searches in Amazon Q. We use an example of an illustrative ServiceNow platform to discuss technical topics related to AWS services.

Find accurate answers from content in ServiceNow using Amazon Q Business

After you integrate Amazon Q Business with ServiceNow, you can ask questions from the description of the document, such as:

• How do I troubleshoot an invalid IP configuration on a network router? – This could be derived from an internal knowledge article on that topic
• Which form do I use to request a new email account? – This could be derived from an internal Service Catalog entry
• Is there a previous incident on the topic of resetting cloud root user password? – This could be derived from an internal incident entry

Overview of the ServiceNow connector

A data source connector is a mechanism for integrating and synchronizing data from multiple repositories into one container index. Amazon Q Business offers multiple data source connectors that can connect to your data sources and help you create your generative AI solution with minimal configuration.

To crawl and index contents in ServiceNow, we configure Amazon Q Business ServiceNow connector as a data source in your Amazon Q business application.

When you connect Amazon Q Business to a data source and initiate the data synchronization process, Amazon Q Business crawls and adds documents from the data source to its index.

Types of documents

Let’s look at what are considered as documents in the context of Amazon Q Business ServiceNow connector.

The Amazon Q Business ServiceNow connector supports crawling of the following entities in ServiceNow:

• Knowledge articles – Each article is considered a single document
• Knowledge article attachments – Each attachment is considered a single document
• Service Catalog – Each catalog item is considered a single document
• Service Catalog attachments – Each catalog attachment is considered a single document
• Incidents – Each incident is considered a single document
• Incident attachments – Each incident attachment is considered a single document

Although not all metadata is available at the time of writing, you can also configure field mappings. Field mappings allow you to map ServiceNow field names to Amazon Q index field names. This includes both default field mappings created automatically by Amazon Q, as well as custom field mappings that you can create and edit. Refer to ServiceNow data source connector field mappings documentation for more information.

Authentication

The Amazon Q Business ServiceNow connector support two types of authentication methods:

• Basic authentication – ServiceNow host URL, user name, and password
• OAuth 2.0 authentication with Resource Owner Password Flow – ServiceNow host URL, user name, password, client ID, and client secret

Supported ServiceNow versions

ServiceNow usually names platform versions after cities for the added convenience of easily differentiating between versions and associated features. At the time of writing, the following versions are natively supported in the Amazon Q Business ServiceNow connector:

• San Diego
• Tokyo
• Rome
• Vancouver
• Others

ACL crawling

To maintain a secure environment, Amazon Q Business now requires ACL and identity crawling for all connected data sources. When preparing to connect Amazon Q Business applications to AWS IAM Identity Center, you need to enable ACL indexing and identity crawling and re-synchronize your connector.

Amazon Q Business enforces data security by supporting the crawling of ACLs and identity information from connected data sources. Indexing documents with ACLs is crucial for maintaining data security, because documents without ACLs are considered public.

If you need to index documents without ACLs, make sure they’re explicitly marked as public in your data source. When connecting a ServiceNow data source, Amazon Q Business crawls ACL information, including user and group information, from your ServiceNow instance. With ACL crawling, you can filter chat responses based on the end-user’s document access level, making sure users only see information they’re authorized to access.

In ServiceNow, user IDs are mapped from user emails and exist on files with set access permissions. This mapping allows Amazon Q Business to effectively enforce access controls based on the user’s identity and permissions within the ServiceNow environment.

Refer to How Amazon Q Business connector crawls ServiceNow ACLs for more information.

Overview of solution

Amazon Q is a generative-AI powered assistant that helps customers answer questions, provide summaries, generate content, and complete tasks based on data in their company repository. It also exists as a learning tool for AWS users who want to ask questions about services and best practices in the cloud. You can use the Amazon Q connector for ServiceNow online to crawl your ServiceNow domain and index service tickets, guides, and community posts to discover answers for your questions faster.

Amazon Q understands and respects your existing identities, roles, and permissions and uses this information to personalize its interactions. If a user doesn’t have permission to access data without Amazon Q, they can’t access it using Amazon Q either. The following table outlines which documents each user is authorized to access for our use case. For a complete list of ServiceNow roles, refer to documentation. The documents being used in this example are a subset of AWS public documents from re:Post pre-loaded into ServiceNow with access restriction.

In this post, we show how to use the Amazon Q Business ServiceNow connector to index data from your ServiceNow platform for intelligent search.

Prerequisites

For this walkthrough, you should have the following prerequisites:

• An AWS account
• Administrator-level access to your ServiceNow platform
• Privileges to create an Amazon Q Business application, AWS resources, and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles and policies
• Basic knowledge of AWS services and working knowledge of ServiceNow
• IAM Identity Center set up for user management

Configure your ServiceNow connection

In your ServiceNow platform, complete the following steps to create an OAuth2 secret that could be consumed from your Amazon Q application:

1. In ServiceNow, on the All menu, expand System OAuth and choose Application Registry.

2. Choose New.

3. Choose Create an OAuth API endpoint for external clients.

4. For Name, enter a unique name.
5. Fill out the remaining parameters according to your requirements and choose Submit.

Note down the client ID and client secret to use in later steps.

Create an Amazon Q Business application

Complete the following steps to create an Amazon Q Business application:

1. On the Amazon Q console, choose Getting started in the navigation pane.
2. Under Amazon Q Business Pro, choose Q Business to subscribe.

3. On the Amazon Q Business console, choose Get started.

4. On the Applications page, choose Create application.

5. On the Create application page, provide your application details.
6. Choose Create.

Make sure the Amazon Q Business application is connected to IAM Identity Center. For more information, see Setting up Amazon Q Business with IAM Identity Center as identity provider.

7. On the Select retriever page, select Use native retriever for your retriever and select Starter for the index provisioning type.
8. Choose Next.

9. On the Connect data sources page, choose Next without connecting to any data source (we do that in the next section).

10. On the Add groups and users page, choose Add groups and users.

11. Add any groups and users to access the application.

For more details, refer to Adding users and subscriptions to an Amazon Q Business application.

12. Choose Create application.

Configure the data source using the Amazon Q ServiceNow Online connector

Now let’s configure the ServiceNow Online data source connector with the Amazon Q application that we created in the previous section.

1. On the Amazon Q console, navigate to the Applications page and choose the application you just created.

2. In the Data sources section, choose Add data source.

3. Search for and choose the ServiceNow Online connector.

4. Provide the name, ServiceNow host, and version information.

If your ServiceNow version isn’t on the dropdown menu, choose Others.

5. Choose Create and add new secret to create a new secret to connect with the ServiceNow platform account.

6. Provide the connection information based on the OAuth2 endpoint created in ServiceNow previously, then choose Save.

7. Leave the defaults for the VPC and Identity crawler
8. For IAM role, choose Create a new service role (Recommended) and keep the default role name.

9. Choose entities that you want to bring over from ServiceNow.

This example shows knowledge articles, Service Catalog items, and incidents. The Filter query option helps curate the list of items that you want to bring into Amazon Q. When you use a query, you can specify multiple knowledge bases, including private knowledge bases. For more details on how to build ServiceNow filters, refer to Filters. For additional query building resources, see Specifying documents to index with a query.

10. For Sync mode, select Full sync.
11. For Sync run schedule, choose Run on demand.

12. Leave the remaining options as default and choose Add data source.

13. When the data source status shows as Active, initiate data synchronization by choosing Sync now.

Wait until the synchronization status changes to Completed before continuing to the next steps.

For information about common issues encountered and related troubleshooting steps, refer to Troubleshooting data source connectors.

Run queries with the Amazon Q web experience

Now that the data synchronization is complete, you can start exploring insights from Amazon Q. You have three users for testing— John with admin access, Mary with access to knowledge articles and service catalog, and Mateo with access only to incidents. In the following steps, you will sign in as each user and ask various questions to see what responses Amazon Q provides based on the permitted document types for their respective groups. You will also test edge cases where users try to access information from restricted sources to validate the access control functionality.

1. On the details page of the new Amazon Q application, navigate to the Web experience settings tab and choose the link under Deployed URL. This will open a new tab with a preview of the UI and options to customize according to your needs.

2. Log in to the application as John Stiles first, using the credentials for the user that you added to the Amazon Q application.

3. After the login is successful, choose the application that you just created.

4. From there, you’ll be redirected to the Amazon Q assistant UI, where you can start asking questions using natural language and get insights from your ServiceNow platform.

5. Let’s run some queries to see how Amazon Q can answer questions related to synchronized data. John has access to all ServiceNow document types. When asked “How do I upgrade my EKS cluster to the latest version”, Amazon Q will provide a summary pulling information from the related knowledge article, highlighting the sources at the end of each excerpt.

6. Still logged in as John, when asked “What is Amazon QLDB?”, Amazon Q will provide a summary pulling information from the related ServiceNow incident.

7. Sign out as user John. Start a new incognito browser session or use a different browser. Copy the web experience URL and sign in as user Mary. Repeat these steps each time you need to sign in as a different user. Mary only has access to knowledge articles and service catalog with no incident access. When asked “How do I perform vector search with Amazon Redshift”, Amazon Q will provide a summary pulling information from the related knowledge article, highlighting the source.

8. However, when asked “What is Amazon QLDB?”, Amazon Q responds that it could not find relevant information. This because Mary does not have access to ServiceNow incidents which is the only place where the answer to that question can be found.

9. Sign out as user Mary. Start a new incognito browser session or use a different browser. Copy the web experience URL and sign in as user Mateo. Mateo only has access to incidents with no knowledge article or service catalog access. When asked “What is Amazon QLDB?”, Amazon Q will provide a summary pulling information from the related incident, highlighting the source.

10. However, when asked “How do I perform vector search with Amazon Redshift?”, Amazon Q responds that it could not find relevant information. This because Mateo does not have access to ServiceNow knowledge article which is the only place where the answer to this question can be found.

Try out the assistant with additional queries, such as:

• How do you set up new blackberry device?
• How do I set up S3 object replication?
• How do I resolve empty log issues in CloudWatch?
• How do I troubleshoot 403 Access Denied errors from Amazon S3?

Frequently asked questions

In this section, we provide guidance to frequently asked questions.

Amazon Q Business is unable to answer your questions

If you get the response “Sorry, I could not find relevant information to complete your request,” this may be due to a few reasons:

• No permissions – ACLs applied to your account don’t allow you to query certain data sources. If this is the case, reach out to your application administrator to make sure your ACLs are configured to access the data sources.
• Email ID doesn’t match user ID – In rare scenarios, a user may have a different email ID associated with Amazon Q in IAM Identity Center than what is associated in the ServiceNow user profile. In such cases, make sure the Amazon Q user profile is updated to recognize the ServiceNow email ID through the update-user command in the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) or the related API call.
• Data connector sync failed – Your data connector may have failed to sync information from the source to the Amazon Q Business application. Verify the data connector’s sync run schedule and sync history to confirm the sync is successful.
• Empty or private ServiceNow projects – Private or empty projects aren’t crawled during the sync run.

If none of these reasons apply to your use case, open a support case and work with your technical account manager to get this resolved.

How to generate responses from authoritative data sources

If you want Amazon Q Business to only generate responses from authoritative data sources, you can configure this using the Amazon Q Business application global controls under Admin controls and guardrails.

1. Log in to the Amazon Q Business console as an Amazon Q Business application administrator.
2. Navigate to the application and choose Admin controls and guardrails in the navigation pane.
3. Choose Edit in the Global controls section to set these options.

For more information, refer to Admin controls and guardrails in Amazon Q Business.

Amazon Q Business responds using old (stale) data even though your data source is updated

Each Amazon Q Business data connector can be configured with a unique sync run schedule frequency. Verifying the sync status and sync schedule frequency for your data connector reveals when the last sync ran successfully. It could be that your data connector’s sync run schedule is either set to sync at a scheduled time of day, week, or month. If it’s set to run on demand, the sync has to be manually invoked. When the sync run is complete, verify the sync history to make sure the run has successfully synced all new issues. Refer to Sync run schedule for more information about each option.

Clean up

To avoid incurring future charges, clean up any resources created as part of this solution. Delete the Amazon Q ServiceNow Online connector data source, OAuth API endpoint created in ServiceNow, and the Q Business application. Also, delete the user management setup in IAM Identity Center.

Conclusion

In this post, we discussed how to configure the Amazon Q ServiceNow Online connector to crawl and index service tickets, community posts, and knowledge guides. We showed how generative AI-based search in Amazon Q enables your business leaders and agents to discover insights from your ServiceNow content quicker. This is all available through a user-friendly interface with Amazon Q Business doing the undifferentiated heavy lifting.

To learn more about the Amazon Q Business connector for ServiceNow Online, refer to Connecting ServiceNow Online to Amazon Q Business.

About the Authors

Prabhakar Chandrasekaran is a Senior Technical Account Manager with AWS Enterprise Support. Prabhakar enjoys helping customers build cutting-edge AI/ML solutions on the cloud. He also works with enterprise customers providing proactive guidance and operational assistance, helping them improve the value of their solutions when using AWS. Prabhakar holds six AWS and seven other professional certifications. With over 20 years of professional experience, Prabhakar was a data engineer and a program leader in the financial services space prior to joining AWS.

Lakshmi Dogiparti is a is a Software Development Engineer at Amazon Web Services. She works on the Amazon Q and Amazon Kendra connector design, development, integration and test operations.

Vijai Gandikota is a Principal Product Manager in the Amazon Q and Amazon Kendra organization of Amazon Web Services. He is responsible for the Amazon Q and Amazon Kendra connectors, ingestion, security, and other aspects of the Amazon Q and Amazon Kendra services.

Read More

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) provides an opportunity for improvements in healthcare by combining and analyzing structured and unstructured data across previously disconnected silos. Generative AI can help raise the bar on efficiency and effectiveness across the full scope of healthcare delivery.

The healthcare industry generates and collects a significant amount of unstructured textual data, including clinical documentation such as patient information, medical history, and test results, as well as non-clinical documentation like administrative records. This unstructured data can impact the efficiency and productivity of clinical services, because it’s often found in various paper-based forms that can be difficult to manage and process. Streamlining the handling of this information is crucial for healthcare providers to improve patient care and optimize their operations.

Handling large volumes of data, extracting unstructured data from multiple paper forms or images, and comparing it with the standard or reference forms can be a long and arduous process, prone to errors and inefficiencies. However, advancements in generative AI solutions have introduced automated approaches that offer a more efficient and reliable solution for comparing multiple documents.

Amazon Bedrock is a fully managed service that makes foundation models (FMs) from leading AI startups and Amazon available through an API, so you can choose from a wide range of FMs to find the model that is best suited for your use case. Amazon Bedrock offers a serverless experience, so you can get started quickly, privately customize FMs with your own data, and quickly integrate and deploy them into your applications using the AWS tools without having to manage the infrastructure.

In this post, we explore using the Anthropic Claude 3 on Amazon Bedrock large language model (LLM). Amazon Bedrock provides access to several LLMs, such as Anthropic Claude 3, which can be used to generate semi-structured data relevant to the healthcare industry. This can be particularly useful for creating various healthcare-related forms, such as patient intake forms, insurance claim forms, or medical history questionnaires.

Solution overview

To provide a high-level understanding of how the solution works before diving deeper into the specific elements and the services used, we discuss the architectural steps required to build our solution on AWS. We illustrate the key elements of the solution, giving you an overview of the various components and their interactions.

We then examine each of the key elements in more detail, exploring the specific AWS services that are used to build the solution, and discuss how these services work together to achieve the desired functionality. This provides a solid foundation for further exploration and implementation of the solution.

Part 1: Standard forms: Data extraction and storage

The following diagram highlights the key elements of a solution for data extraction and storage with standard forms.

Figure 1: Architecture – Standard Form – Data Extraction & Storage.

The Standard from processing steps are as follows:

1. A user upload images of paper forms (PDF, PNG, JPEG) to Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), a highly scalable and durable object storage service.
2. Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) is used as the message queue. Whenever a new form is loaded, an event is invoked in Amazon SQS.
   1. If an S3 object is not processed, then after two tries it will be moved to the SQS dead-letter queue (DLQ), which can be configured further with an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic to notify the user through email.
3. The SQS message invokes an AWS Lambda The Lambda function is responsible for processing the new form data.
4. The Lambda function reads the new S3 object and passes it to the Amazon Textract API to process the unstructured data and generate a hierarchical, structured output. Amazon Textract is an AWS service that can extract text, handwriting, and data from scanned documents and images. This approach allows for the efficient and scalable processing of complex documents, enabling you to extract valuable insights and data from various sources.
5. The Lambda function passes the converted text to Anthropic Claude 3 on Amazon Bedrock Anthropic Claude 3 to generate a list of questions.
6. Lastly, the Lambda function stores the question list in Amazon S3.

Amazon Bedrock API call to extract form details

We call an Amazon Bedrock API twice in the process for the following actions:

• Extract questions from the standard or reference form – The first API call is made to extract a list of questions and sub-questions from the standard or reference form. This list serves as a baseline or reference point for comparison with other forms. By extracting the questions from the reference form, we can establish a benchmark against which other forms can be evaluated.
• Extract questions from the custom form – The second API call is made to extract a list of questions and sub-questions from the custom form or the form that needs to be compared against the standard or reference form. This step is necessary because we need to analyze the custom form’s content and structure to identify its questions and sub-questions before we can compare them with the reference form.

By having the questions extracted and structured separately for both the reference and custom forms, the solution can then pass these two lists to the Amazon Bedrock API for the final comparison step. This approach maintains the following:

• Accurate comparison – The API has access to the structured data from both forms, making it straightforward to identify matches, mismatches, and provide relevant reasoning
• Efficient processing – Separating the extraction process for the reference and custom forms helps avoid redundant operations and optimizes the overall workflow
• Observability and interoperability – Keeping the questions separate enables better visibility, analysis, and integration of the questions from different forms
• Hallucination avoidance – By following a structured approach and relying on the extracted data, the solution helps avoid generating or hallucinating content, providing integrity in the comparison process

This two-step approach uses the capabilities of the Amazon Bedrock API while optimizing the workflow, enabling accurate and efficient form comparison, and promoting observability and interoperability of the questions involved.

See the following code (API Call):

def get_response_from_claude3(context, prompt_data):
    body = json.dumps({
        "anthropic_version": "bedrock-2023-05-31",
        "max_tokens": 4096,
        "system":"""You are an expert form analyzer and can understand different sections and subsections within a form and can find all the questions  being asked. You can find similarities and differences at the question level between different types of forms.""",
        "messages": [
            {
                "role": "user",
                "content": [
                    {"type": "text", 
                     "text": f"""Given the following document(s): {context} n {prompt_data}"""},
                ],
            }
        ],
    })
    modelId = f'anthropic.claude-3-sonnet-20240229-v1:0'     
    config = Config(read_timeout=1000)
    bedrock = boto3.client('bedrock-runtime',config=config)    
    response = bedrock.invoke_model(body=body, modelId=modelId)
    response_body = json.loads(response.get("body").read())
    answer = response_body.get("content")[0].get("text")
   return answer

User prompt to extract fields and list them

We provide the following user prompt to Anthropic Claude 3 to extract the fields from the raw text and list them for comparison as shown in step 3B (of Figure 3: Data Extraction & Form Field comparison).

get_response_from_claude3(response, f""" Create a summary of the different sections in the form, then
                                         for each section create a list of all questions and sub questions asked in the
                                         whole form and group by section including signature, date, reviews and approvals. 
                                         Then concatenate all questions and return a single numbered list, Be very detailed."""))

The following figure illustrates the output from Amazon Bedrock with a list of questions from the standard or reference form.

Figure 2:  Standard Form Sample Question List

Store this question list in Amazon S3 so it can be used for comparison with other forms, as shown in Part 2 of the process below.

Part 2: Data extraction and form field comparison

The following diagram illustrates the architecture for the next step, which is data extraction and form field comparison.

Figure 3: Data Extraction & Form Field comparison

Steps 1 and 2 are similar to those in Figure 1, but are repeated for the forms to be compared against the standard or reference forms. The next steps are as follows:

3. The SQS message invokes a Lambda function. The Lambda function is responsible for processing the new form data.
   1. The raw text is extracted by Amazon Textract using a Lambda function. The extracted raw text is then passed to Step 3B for further processing and analysis.
   2. Anthropic Claude 3 generates a list of questions from the custom form that needs to be compared with the standard from. Then both forms and document question lists are passed to Amazon Bedrock, which compares the extracted raw text with standard or reference raw text to identify differences and anomalies to provide insights and recommendations relevant to the healthcare industry by respective category. It then generates the final output in JSON format for further processing and dashboarding. The Amazon Bedrock API call and user prompt from Step 5 (Figure 1: Architecture – Standard Form – Data Extraction & Storage) are reused for this step to generate a question list from the custom form.

We discuss Steps 4–6 in the next section.

The following screenshot shows the output from Amazon Bedrock with a list of questions from the custom form.

Figure 4:  Custom Form Sample Question List

Final comparison using Anthropic Claude 3 on Amazon Bedrock:

The following examples show the results from the comparison exercise using Amazon Bedrock with Anthropic Claude 3, showing one that matched and one that didn’t match with the reference or standard form.

The following is the user prompt for forms comparison:

categories = ['Personal Information','Work History','Medical History','Medications and Allergies','Additional Questions','Physical Examination','Job Description','Examination Results']
forms = f"Form 1 : {reference_form_question_list}, Form 2 : {custom_form_question_list}"

The following is the first call:

match_result = (get_response_from_claude3(forms, f""" Go through questions and sub questions {start}- {processed} in Form 2 return the question whether it matches with any question /sub question/field in Form 1 in terms of meaning and context and provide reasoning, or if it does not match with any question/sub question/field in Form 1 and provide reasoning. Treat each sub question as its own question and the final output should be a numbered list with the same length as the number of questions and sub questions in Form 2. Be concise"""))

The following is the second call:

get_response_from_claude3(match_result, 
f""" Go through all the questions and sub questions in the Form 2 Results and turn this into a JSON object called 'All Questions' which has the keys 'Question' with only the matched or unmatched question, 'Match' with valid values of yes or no, and 'Reason' which is the reason of match or no match, ‘Category' placing the question in one the categories in this list: {categories} . Do not omit any questions in output."""))

The following screenshot shows the questions matched with the reference form.

The following screenshot shows the questions that didn’t match with the reference form.

The steps from the preceding architecture diagram continue as follows:

4. The SQS queue invokes a Lambda function.

5. The Lambda function invokes an AWS Glue job and monitors for completion.

a. The AWS Glue job processes the final JSON output from the Amazon Bedrock model in tabular format for reporting.

6. Amazon QuickSight is used to create interactive dashboards and visualizations, allowing healthcare professionals to explore the analysis, identify trends, and make informed decisions based on the insights provided by Anthropic Claude 3.

The following screenshot shows a sample QuickSight dashboard.

Next steps

Many healthcare providers are investing in digital technology, such as electronic health records (EHRs) and electronic medical records (EMRs) to streamline data collection and storage, allowing appropriate staff to access records for patient care. Additionally, digitized health records provide the convenience of electronic forms and remote data editing for patients. Electronic health records offer a more secure and accessible record system, reducing data loss and facilitating data accuracy. Similar solutions can offer capturing the data in these paper forms into EHRs.

Conclusion

Generative AI solutions like Amazon Bedrock with Anthropic Claude 3 can significantly streamline the process of extracting and comparing unstructured data from paper forms or images. By automating the extraction of form fields and questions, and intelligently comparing them against standard or reference forms, this solution offers a more efficient and accurate approach to handling large volumes of data. The integration of AWS services like Lambda, Amazon S3, Amazon SQS, and QuickSight provides a scalable and robust architecture for deploying this solution. As healthcare organizations continue to digitize their operations, such AI-powered solutions can play a crucial role in improving data management, maintaining compliance, and ultimately enhancing patient care through better insights and decision-making.

About the Authors

Satish Sarapuri is a Sr. Data Architect, Data Lake at AWS. He helps enterprise-level customers build high-performance, highly available, cost-effective, resilient, and secure generative AI, data mesh, data lake, and analytics platform solutions on AWS, through which customers can make data-driven decisions to gain impactful outcomes for their business and help them on their digital and data transformation journey. In his spare time, he enjoys spending time with his family and playing tennis.

Harpreet Cheema is a Machine Learning Engineer at the AWS Generative AI Innovation Center. He is very passionate in the field of machine learning and in tackling data-oriented problems. In his role, he focuses on developing and delivering machine learning focused solutions for customers across different domains.

Deborah Devadason is a Senior Advisory Consultant in the Professional Service team at Amazon Web Services. She is a results-driven and passionate Data Strategy specialist with over 25 years of consulting experience across the globe in multiple industries. She leverages her expertise to solve complex problems and accelerate business-focused journeys, thereby creating a stronger backbone for the digital and data transformation journey.

Read More

As the scale and complexity of data handled by organizations increase, traditional rules-based approaches to analyzing the data alone are no longer viable. Instead, organizations are increasingly looking to take advantage of transformative technologies like machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) to deliver innovative products, improve outcomes, and gain operational efficiencies at scale. Furthermore, the democratization of AI and ML through AWS and AWS Partner solutions is accelerating its adoption across all industries.

For example, a health-tech company may be looking to improve patient care by predicting the probability that an elderly patient may become hospitalized by analyzing both clinical and non-clinical data. This will allow them to intervene early, personalize the delivery of care, and make the most efficient use of existing resources, such as hospital bed capacity and nursing staff.

AWS offers the broadest and deepest set of AI and ML services and supporting infrastructure, such as Amazon SageMaker and Amazon Bedrock, to help you at every stage of your AI/ML adoption journey, including adoption of generative AI. Splunk, an AWS Partner, offers a unified security and observability platform built for speed and scale.

As the diversity and volume of data increases, it is vital to understand how they can be harnessed at scale by using complementary capabilities of the two platforms. For organizations looking beyond the use of out-of-the-box Splunk AI/ML features, this post explores how Amazon SageMaker Canvas, a no-code ML development service, can be used in conjunction with data collected in Splunk to drive actionable insights. We also demonstrate how to use the generative AI capabilities of SageMaker Canvas to speed up your data exploration and help you build better ML models.

Use case overview

In this example, a health-tech company offering remote patient monitoring is collecting operational data from wearables using Splunk. These device metrics and logs are ingested into and stored in a Splunk index, a repository of incoming data. Within Splunk, this data is used to fulfill context-specific security and observability use cases by Splunk users, such as monitoring the security posture and uptime of devices and performing proactive maintenance of the fleet.

Separately, the company uses AWS data services, such as Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), to store data related to patients, such as patient information, device ownership details, and clinical telemetry data obtained from the wearables. These could include exports from customer relationship management (CRM), configuration management database (CMDB), and electronic health record (EHR) systems. In this example, they have access to an extract of patient information and hospital admission records that reside in an S3 bucket.

The following table illustrates the different data explored in this example use case.

This post describes an approach with two key components:

• The two data sources are stored alongside each other using a common AWS data engineering pipeline. Data is presented to the personas that need access using a unified interface.
• An ML model to predict hospital admissions (admitted) is developed using the combined dataset and SageMaker Canvas. Professionals without a background in ML are empowered to analyze the data using no-code tooling.

The solution allows custom ML models to be developed from a broader variety of clinical and non-clinical data sources to cater for different real-life scenarios. For example, it can be used to answer questions such as “If patients have a propensity to have their wearables turned off and there is no clinical telemetry data available, can the likelihood that they are hospitalized still be accurately predicted?”

AWS data engineering pipeline

The adaptable approach detailed in this post starts with an automated data engineering pipeline to make data stored in Splunk available to a wide range of personas, including business intelligence (BI) analysts, data scientists, and ML practitioners, through a SQL interface. This is achieved by using the pipeline to transfer data from a Splunk index into an S3 bucket, where it will be cataloged.

The approach is shown in the following diagram.

Figure 1: Architecture overview of data engineering pipeline

The automated AWS data pipeline consists of the following steps:

1. Data from wearables is stored in a Splunk index where it can be queried by users, such as security operations center (SOC) analysts, using the Splunk search processing language (SPL). Spunk’s out-of-the-box AI/ML capabilities, such as the Splunk Machine Learning Toolkit (Splunk MLTK) and purpose-built models for security and observability use cases (for example, for anomaly detection and forecasting), can be utilized inside the Splunk Platform. Using these Splunk ML features allows you to derive contextualized insights quickly without the need for additional AWS infrastructure or skills.
2. Some organizations may look to develop custom, differentiated ML models, or want to build AI-enabled applications using AWS services for their specific use cases. To facilitate this, an automated data engineering pipeline is built using AWS Step Functions. The Step Functions state machine is configured with an AWS Lambda function to retrieve data from the Splunk index using the Splunk Enterprise SDK for Python. The SPL query requested through this REST API call is scoped to only retrieve the data of interest.
   • 1. Lambda supports container images. This solution uses a Lambda function that runs a Docker container image. This allows larger data manipulation libraries, such as pandas and PyArrow, to be included in the deployment package.
     2. If a large volume of data is being exported, the code may need to run for longer than the maximum possible duration, or require more memory than supported by Lambda functions. If this is the case, Step Functions can be configured to directly run a container task on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS).
3. For authentication and authorization, the Spunk bearer token is securely retrieved from AWS Secrets Manager by the Lambda function before calling the Splunk /search REST API endpoint. This bearer authentication token lets users access the REST endpoint using an authenticated identity.
4. Data retrieved by the Lambda function is transformed (if required) and uploaded to the designated S3 bucket alongside other datasets. This data is partitioned and compressed, and stored in storage and performance-optimized Apache Parquet file format.
5. As its last step, the Step Functions state machine runs an AWS Glue crawler to infer the schema of the Splunk data residing in the S3 bucket, and catalogs it for wider consumption as tables using the AWS Glue Data Catalog.
6. Wearable data exported from Splunk is now available to users and applications through the Data Catalog as a table. Analytics tooling such as Amazon Athena can now be used to query the data using SQL.
7. As data stored in your AWS environment grows, it is essential to have centralized governance in place. AWS Lake Formation allows you to simplify permissions management and data sharing to maintain security and compliance.

An AWS Serverless Application Model (AWS SAM) template is available to deploy all AWS resources required by this solution. This template can be found in the accompanying GitHub repository.

Refer to the README file for required prerequisites, deployment steps, and the process to test the data engineering pipeline solution.

AWS AI/ML analytics workflow

After the data engineering pipeline’s Step Functions state machine successfully completes and wearables data from Splunk is accessible alongside patient healthcare data using Athena, we use an example approach based on SageMaker Canvas to drive actionable insights.

SageMaker Canvas is a no-code visual interface that empowers you to prepare data, build, and deploy highly accurate ML models, streamlining the end-to-end ML lifecycle in a unified environment. You can prepare and transform data through point-and-click interactions and natural language, powered by Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. You can also tap into the power of automated machine learning (AutoML) and automatically build custom ML models for regression, classification, time series forecasting, natural language processing, and computer vision, supported by Amazon SageMaker Autopilot.

In this example, we use the service to classify whether a patient is likely to be admitted to a hospital over the next 30 days based on the combined dataset.

The approach is shown in the following diagram.

Figure 2: Architecture overview of ML development

The solution consists of the following steps:

1. An AWS Glue crawler crawls the data stored in S3 bucket. The Data Catalog exposes this data found in the folder structure as tables.
2. Athena provides a query engine to allow people and applications to interact with the tables using SQL.
3. SageMaker Canvas uses Athena as a data source to allow the data stored in the tables to be used for ML model development.

Solution overview

SageMaker Canvas allows you to build a custom ML model using a dataset that you have imported. In the following sections, we demonstrate how to create, explore, and transform a sample dataset, use natural language to query the data, check for data quality, create additional steps for the data flow, and build, test, and deploy an ML model.

Prerequisites

Before proceeding, refer to Getting started with using Amazon SageMaker Canvas to make sure you have the required prerequisites in place. Specifically, validate that the AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) role your SageMaker domain is using has a policy attached with sufficient permissions to access Athena, AWS Glue, and Amazon S3 resources.

Create the dataset

SageMaker Canvas supports Athena as a data source. Data from wearables and patient healthcare data residing across your S3 bucket is accessed using Athena and the Data Catalog. This allows this tabular data to be directly imported into SageMaker Canvas to start your ML development.

To create your dataset, complete the following steps:

1. On the SageMaker Canvas console, choose Data Wrangler in the navigation pane.
2. On the Import and prepare dropdown menu, choose Tabular as the dataset type to denote that the imported data consists of rows and columns.

Figure 3: Importing tabular data using SageMaker Data Wrangler

3. For Select a data source, choose Athena.

On this page, you will see your Data Catalog database and tables listed, named patient_data and splunk_ops_data.

4. Join (inner join) the tables together using the user_id and id to create one overarching dataset that can be used during ML model development.
5. Under Import settings, enter unprocessed_data for Dataset name.
6. Choose Import to complete the process.

Figure 4: Joining data using SageMaker Data Wrangler

The combined dataset is now available to explore and transform using SageMaker Data Wrangler.

Explore and transform the dataset

SageMaker Data Wrangler enables you to transform and analyze the source dataset through data flows while still maintaining a no-code approach.

The previous step automatically created a data flow in the SageMaker Canvas console which we have renamed to data_prep_data_flow.flow. Additionally, two steps are automatically generated, as listed in the following table.

Before we create additional transform steps, let’s explore two SageMaker Canvas features that can help us focus on the right actions.

Use natural language to query the data

SageMaker Data Wrangler also provides generative AI capabilities called Chat for data prep powered by a large language model (LLM). This feature allows you to explore your data using natural language without any background in ML or SQL. Furthermore, any contextualized recommendations returned by the generative AI model can be introduced directly back into the data flow without writing any code.

In this section, we present some example prompts to demonstrate this in action. These examples have been selected to illustrate the art of the possible. We recommend that you experiment with different prompts to gain the best results for your particular use cases.

Example 1: Identify Splunk default fields

In this first example, we want to know whether there are Splunk default fields that we could potentially exclude from our dataset prior to ML model development.

1. In SageMaker Data Wrangler, open your data flow.
2. Choose Step 2 Data types, and choose Chat for data prep.
3. In the Chat for data prep pane, you can enter prompts in natural language to explore and transform the data. For example:

Prompt: This data has been exported from a Splunk index. Which columns are likely to be Splunk default fields? 
Response: _bkt, _cd, _indextime, _raw, _si, _sourcetype, _time are likely Splunk default fields based on the Summary section showing they are mostly metadata/index fields. 
Prompt: OK. Let's drop _bkt, _cd, _indextime, _raw, _si, _sourcetype, and _time. 
Response: The code drops the columns '_bkt', '_cd', '_indextime', '_raw', '_si', '_sourcetype' and '_time' from the dataframe df using the drop() method.

In this example, the generative AI LLM has correctly identified Splunk default fields that could be safely dropped from the dataset.

4. Choose Add to steps to add this identified transformation to the data flow.

Figure 5: Using SageMaker Data Wrangler’s chat for data prep to identify Splunk’s default fields

Example 2: Identify additional columns that could be dropped

We now want to identify any further columns that could be dropped without being too specific about what we’re looking for. We want the LLM to make the suggestions based on the data, and provide us with the rationale. For example:

Prompt: List out the names of other columns that we should drop before ML development. Give me a list of columns, along with the reasons why. 
Response: The code drops the timestamp, punct, id, index and linecount columns from the dataset. These columns do not contain useful information for machine learning and would add noise to the models.

In addition to the Splunk default fields identified earlier, the generative AI model is now proposing the removal of columns such as timestamp, punct, id, index, and linecount that don’t appear to be conducive to ML model development.

Figure 6: Using SageMaker Data Wrangler’s chat for data prep to identify additional fields that can be dropped

Example 3: Calculate average age column in dataset

You can also use the generative AI model to perform Text2SQL tasks in which you can simply ask questions of the data using natural language. This is useful if you want to validate the content of the dataset.

In this example, we want to know what the average patient age value is within the dataset:

Prompt: What is the average age column of the dataset? 
Response: The average age in the dataset is 67 years.

By expanding View code, you can see what SQL statements the LLM has constructed using its Text2SQL capabilities. This gives you full visibility into how the results are being returned.

Figure 7: Using SageMaker Data Wrangler’s chat for data prep to run SQL statements

Check for data quality

SageMaker Canvas also provides exploratory data analysis (EDA) capabilities that allow you to gain deeper insights into the data prior to the ML model build step. With EDA, you can generate visualizations and analyses to validate whether you have the right data, and whether your ML model build is likely to yield results that are aligned to your organization’s expectations.

Example 1: Create a Data Quality and Insights Report

Complete the following steps to create a Data Quality and Insights Report:

1. While in the data flow step, choose the Analyses tab.
2. For Analysis type, choose Data Quality and Insights Report.
3. For Target column, choose admitted.
4. For Problem type, choose Classification.

This performs an analysis of the data that you have and provides information such as the number of missing values and outliers.

Figure 8: Running SageMaker Data Wrangler’s data quality and insights report

Refer to Get Insights On Data and Data Quality for details on how to interpret the results of this report.

Example 2: Create a Quick Model

In this second example, choose Quick Model for Analysis type and for Target column, choose admitted. The Quick Model estimates the expected predicted quality of the model.

By running the analysis, the estimated F1 score (a measure of predictive performance) of the model and feature importance scores are displayed.

Figure 9: Running SageMaker Data Wrangler’s quick model feature to assess the potential accuracy of the model

SageMaker Canvas supports many other analysis types. By reviewing these analyses in advance of your ML model build, you can continue to engineer the data and features to gain sufficient confidence that the ML model will meet your business objectives.

Create additional steps in the data flow

In this example, we have decided to update our data_prep_data_flow.flow data flow to implement additional transformations. The following table summarizes these steps.

To create a new transform, view the data flow, then choose Add transform on the last step.

Figure 10: Using SageMaker Data Wrangler to add a transform to a data flow

Choose Add transform, and proceed to choose a transform type and its configuration.

Figure 11: Using SageMaker Data Wrangler to add a transform to a data flow

The following screenshot shows our newly updated end-to-end data flow featuring multiple steps. In this example, we ran the analyses at the end of the data flow.

Figure 12: Showing the end-to-end SageMaker Canvas Data Wrangler data flow

If you want to incorporate this data flow into a productionized ML workflow, SageMaker Canvas can create a Jupyter notebook that exports your data flow to Amazon SageMaker Pipelines.

Develop the ML model

To get started with ML model development, complete the following steps:

1. Choose Create model directly from the last step of the data flow.

Figure 13: Creating a model from the SageMaker Data Wrangler data flow

2. For Dataset name, enter a name for your transformed dataset (for example, processed_data).
3. Choose Export.

Figure 14: Naming the exported dataset to be used by the model in SageMaker Data Wrangler

This step will automatically create a new dataset.

4. After the dataset has been created successfully, choose Create model to begin the ML model creation.

Figure 15: Creating the model in SageMaker Data Wrangler

5. For Model name, enter a name for the model (for example, my_healthcare_model).
6. For Problem type, select Predictive analysis.
7. Choose Create.

Figure 16: Naming the model in SageMaker Canvas and selecting the predictive analysis type

You are now ready to progress through the Build, Analyze, Predict, and Deploy stages to develop and operationalize the ML model using SageMaker Canvas.

8. On the Build tab, for Target column, choose the column you want to predict (admitted).
9. Choose Quick build to build the model.

The Quick build option has a shorter build time, but the Standard build option generally enjoys higher accuracy.

Figure 17: Selecting the target column to predict in SageMaker Canvas

After a few minutes, on the Analyze tab, you will be able to view the accuracy of the model, along with column impact, scoring, and other advanced metrics. For example, we can see that a feature from the wearables data captured in Splunk—average_num_days_device_active—has a strong impact on whether the patient is likely to be admitted or not, along with their age. As such, the health-tech company may proactively reach out to elderly patients who tend to keep their wearables off to minimize the risk of their hospitalization.

Figure 18: Displaying the results from the model quick build in SageMaker Canvas

When you’re happy with the results from the Quick build, repeat the process with a Standard build to make sure you have an ML model with higher accuracy that can be deployed.

Test the ML model

Our ML model has now been built. If you’re satisfied with its accuracy, you can make predictions using this ML model using net new data on the Predict tab. Predictions can be performed either using batch (list of patients) or for a single entry (one patient).

Experiment with different values and choose Update prediction. The ML model will respond with a prediction for the new values that you have entered.

In this example, the ML model has identified a 64.5% probability that this particular patient will be admitted to hospital in the next 30 days. The health-tech company will likely want to prioritize the care of this patient.

Figure 19: Displaying the results from a single prediction using the model in SageMaker Canvas

Deploy the ML model

It is now possible for the health-tech company to build applications that can use this ML model to make predictions. ML models developed in SageMaker Canvas can be operationalized using a broader set of SageMaker services. For example:

• You can register the model in Amazon SageMaker Model Registry so that data scientists and ML practitioners can continue to tune its performance, after which they can deploy it using machine learning operations (MLOps) practices. SageMaker Model Registry allows you to manage your ML models, compare versions, and visualize metrics. For more information, see Register and Deploy Models with Model Registry.
• You can directly deploy the model as a SageMaker endpoint so that applications can call it to invoke the ML model and make predictions. After a SageMaker endpoint is deployed, it will run 24/7. Refer to Amazon SageMaker pricing for details on on-demand pricing.

To deploy the ML model, complete the following steps:

1. On the Deploy tab, choose Create Deployment.
2. Specify Deployment name, Instance type, and Instance count.
3. Choose Deploy to make the ML model available as a SageMaker endpoint.

In this example, we reduced the instance type to ml.m5.4xlarge and instance count to 1 before deployment.

Figure 20: Deploying the using SageMaker Canvas

At any time, you can directly test the endpoint from SageMaker Canvas on the Test deployment tab of the deployed endpoint listed under Operations on the SageMaker Canvas console.

Refer to the Amazon SageMaker Canvas Developer Guide for detailed steps to take your ML model development through its full development lifecycle and build applications that can consume the ML model to make predictions.

Clean up

Refer to the instructions in the README file to clean up the resources provisioned for the AWS data engineering pipeline solution.

SageMaker Canvas bills you for the duration of the session, and we recommend logging out of SageMaker Canvas when you are not using it. Refer to Logging out of Amazon SageMaker Canvas for more details. Furthermore, if you deployed a SageMaker endpoint, make sure you have deleted it.

Conclusion

This post explored a no-code approach involving SageMaker Canvas that can drive actionable insights from data stored across both Splunk and AWS platforms using AI/ML techniques. We also demonstrated how you can use the generative AI capabilities of SageMaker Canvas to speed up your data exploration and build ML models that are aligned to your business’s expectations.

Learn more about AI on Splunk and ML on AWS.

About the Authors

Alan Peaty is a Senior Partner Solutions Architect, helping Global Systems Integrators (GSIs), Global Independent Software Vendors (GISVs), and their customers adopt AWS services. Prior to joining AWS, Alan worked as an architect at systems integrators such as IBM, Capita, and CGI. Outside of work, Alan is a keen runner who loves to hit the muddy trails of the English countryside, and is an IoT enthusiast.

Brett Roberts is the Global Partner Technical Manager for AWS at Splunk, leading the technical strategy to help customers better secure and monitor their critical AWS environments and applications using Splunk. Brett was a member of the Splunk Trust and holds several Splunk and AWS certifications. Additionally, he co-hosts a community podcast and blog called Big Data Beard, exploring trends and technologies in the analytics and AI space.

Arnaud Lauer is a Principal Partner Solutions Architect in the Public Sector team at AWS. He enables partners and customers to understand how to best use AWS technologies to translate business needs into solutions. He brings more than 18 years of experience in delivering and architecting digital transformation projects across a range of industries, including public sector, energy, and consumer goods.

Read More

This post is co-written by Kevin Plexico and Shakun Vohra from Deltek.

Question and answering (Q&A) using documents is a commonly used application in various use cases like customer support chatbots, legal research assistants, and healthcare advisors. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a leading method for using the power of large language models (LLMs) to interact with documents in natural language.

This post provides an overview of a custom solution developed by the AWS Generative AI Innovation Center (GenAIIC) for Deltek, a globally recognized standard for project-based businesses in both government contracting and professional services. Deltek serves over 30,000 clients with industry-specific software and information solutions.

In this collaboration, the AWS GenAIIC team created a RAG-based solution for Deltek to enable Q&A on single and multiple government solicitation documents. The solution uses AWS services including Amazon Textract, Amazon OpenSearch Service, and Amazon Bedrock. Amazon Bedrock is a fully managed service that offers a choice of high-performing foundation models (FMs) and LLMs from leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies like AI21 Labs, Anthropic, Cohere, Meta, Stability AI, and Amazon through a single API, along with a broad set of capabilities to build generative AI applications with security, privacy, and responsible AI.

Deltek is continuously working on enhancing this solution to better align it with their specific requirements, such as supporting file formats beyond PDF and implementing more cost-effective approaches for their data ingestion pipeline.

What is RAG?

RAG is a process that optimizes the output of LLMs by allowing them to reference authoritative knowledge bases outside of their training data sources before generating a response. This approach addresses some of the challenges associated with LLMs, such as presenting false, outdated, or generic information, or creating inaccurate responses due to terminology confusion. RAG enables LLMs to generate more relevant, accurate, and contextual responses by cross-referencing an organization’s internal knowledge base or specific domains, without the need to retrain the model. It provides organizations with greater control over the generated text output and offers users insights into how the LLM generates the response, making it a cost-effective approach to improve the capabilities of LLMs in various contexts.

The main challenge

Applying RAG for Q&A on a single document is straightforward, but applying the same across multiple related documents poses some unique challenges. For example, when using question answering on documents that evolve over time, it is essential to consider the chronological sequence of the documents if the question is about a concept that has transformed over time. Not considering the order could result in providing an answer that was accurate at a past point but is now outdated based on more recent information across the collection of temporally aligned documents. Properly handling temporal aspects is a key challenge when extending question answering from single documents to sets of interlinked documents that progress over the course of time.

Solution overview

As an example use case, we describe Q&A on two temporally related documents: a long draft request-for-proposal (RFP) document, and a related subsequent government response to a request-for-information (RFI response), providing additional and revised information.

The solution develops a RAG approach in two steps.

The first step is data ingestion, as shown in the following diagram. This includes a one-time processing of PDF documents. The application component here is a user interface with minor processing such as splitting text and calling the services in the background. The steps are as follows:

1. The user uploads documents to the application.
2. The application uses Amazon Textract to get the text and tables from the input documents.
3. The text embedding model processes the text chunks and generates embedding vectors for each text chunk.
4. The embedding representations of text chunks along with related metadata are indexed in OpenSearch Service.

The second step is Q&A, as shown in the following diagram. In this step, the user asks a question about the ingested documents and expects a response in natural language. The application component here is a user interface with minor processing such as calling different services in the background. The steps are as follows:

1. The user asks a question about the documents.
2. The application retrieves an embedding representation of the input question.
3. The application passes the retrieved data from OpenSearch Service and the query to Amazon Bedrock to generate a response. The model performs a semantic search to find relevant text chunks from the documents (also called context). The embedding vector maps the question from text to a space of numeric representations.
4. The question and context are combined and fed as a prompt to the LLM. The language model generates a natural language response to the user’s question.

We used Amazon Textract in our solution, which can convert PDFs, PNGs, JPEGs, and TIFFs into machine-readable text. It also formats complex structures like tables for easier analysis. In the following sections, we provide an example to demonstrate Amazon Textract’s capabilities.

OpenSearch is an open source and distributed search and analytics suite derived from Elasticsearch. It uses a vector database structure to efficiently store and query large volumes of data. OpenSearch Service currently has tens of thousands of active customers with hundreds of thousands of clusters under management processing hundreds of trillions of requests per month. We used OpenSearch Service and its underlying vector database to do the following:

• Index documents into the vector space, allowing related items to be located in proximity for improved relevancy
• Quickly retrieve related document chunks at the question answering step using approximate nearest neighbor search across vectors

The vector database inside OpenSearch Service enabled efficient storage and fast retrieval of related data chunks to power our question answering system. By modeling documents as vectors, we could find relevant passages even without explicit keyword matches.

Text embedding models are machine learning (ML) models that map words or phrases from text to dense vector representations. Text embeddings are commonly used in information retrieval systems like RAG for the following purposes:

• Document embedding – Embedding models are used to encode the document content and map them to an embedding space. It is common to first split a document into smaller chunks such as paragraphs, sections, or fixed size chunks.
• Query embedding – User queries are embedded into vectors so they can be matched against document chunks by performing semantic search.

For this post, we used the Amazon Titan model, Amazon Titan Embeddings G1 – Text v1.2, which intakes up to 8,000 tokens and outputs a numerical vector of 1,536 dimensions. The model is available through Amazon Bedrock.

Amazon Bedrock provides ready-to-use FMs from top AI companies like AI21 Labs, Anthropic, Cohere, Meta, Stability AI, and Amazon. It offers a single interface to access these models and build generative AI applications while maintaining privacy and security. We used Anthropic Claude v2 on Amazon Bedrock to generate natural language answers given a question and a context.

In the following sections, we look at the two stages of the solution in more detail.

Data ingestion

First, the draft RFP and RFI response documents are processed to be used at the Q&A time. Data ingestion includes the following steps:

1. Documents are passed to Amazon Textract to be converted into text.
2. To better enable our language model to answer questions about tables, we created a parser that converts tables from the Amazon Textract output into CSV format. Transforming tables into CSV improves the model’s comprehension. For instance, the following figures show part of an RFI response document in PDF format, followed by its corresponding extracted text. In the extracted text, the table has been converted to CSV format and sits among the rest of the text.
   
3. For long documents, the extracted text may exceed the LLM’s input size limitation. In these cases, we can divide the text into smaller, overlapping chunks. The chunk sizes and overlap proportions may vary depending on the use case. We apply section-aware chunking, (perform chunking independently on each document section), which we discuss in our example use case later in this post.
4. Some classes of documents may follow a standard layout or format. This structure can be used to optimize data ingestion. For example, RFP documents tend to have a certain layout with defined sections. Using the layout, each document section can be processed independently. Also, if a table of contents exists but is not relevant, it can potentially be removed. We provide a demonstration of detecting and using document structure later in this post.
5. The embedding vector for each text chunk is retrieved from an embedding model.
6. At the last step, the embedding vectors are indexed into an OpenSearch Service database. In addition to the embedding vector, the text chunk and document metadata such as document, document section name, or document release date are also added to the index as text fields. The document release date is useful metadata when documents are related chronologically, so that LLM can identify the most updated information. The following code snippet shows the index body:

index_body = {
    "embedding_vector": <embedding vector of a text chunk>,
    "text_chunk": <text chunk>,
    "document_name": <document name>,
    "section_name": <document section name>,
    "release_date": <document release date>,
    # more metadata can be added
}

Q&A

In the Q&A phrase, users can submit a natural language question about the draft RFP and RFI response documents ingested in the previous step. First, semantic search is used to retrieve relevant text chunks to the user’s question. Then, the question is augmented with the retrieved context to create a prompt. Finally, the prompt is sent to Amazon Bedrock for an LLM to generate a natural language response. The detailed steps are as follows:

1. An embedding representation of the input question is retrieved from the Amazon Titan embedding model on Amazon Bedrock.
2. The question’s embedding vector is used to perform semantic search on OpenSearch Service and find the top K relevant text chunks. The following is an example of a search body passed to OpenSearch Service. For more details see the OpenSearch documentation on structuring a search query.

search_body = {
    "size": top_K,
    "query": {
        "script_score": {
            "query": {
                "match_all": {}, # skip full text search
            },
            "script": {
                "lang": "knn",
                "source": "knn_score",
                "params": {
                    "field": "embedding-vector",
                    "query_value": question_embedding,
                    "space_type": "cosinesimil"
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

3. Any retrieved metadata, such as section name or document release date, is used to enrich the text chunks and provide more information to the LLM, such as the following:

   def opensearch_result_to_context(os_res: dict) -> str:
       """
       Convert OpenSearch result to context
       Args:
       os_res (dict): Amazon OpenSearch results
       Returns:
       context (str): Context to be included in LLM's prompt
       """
       data = os_res["hits"]["hits"]
       context = []
       for item in data:
           text = item["_source"]["text_chunk"]
           doc_name = item["_source"]["document_name"]
           section_name = item["_source"]["section_name"]
           release_date = item["_source"]["release_date"]
           context.append(
               f"<<Context>>: [Document name: {doc_name}, Section name: {section_name}, Release date: {release_date}] {text}"
           )
       context = "n n ------ n n".join(context)
       return context

4. The input question is combined with retrieved context to create a prompt. In some cases, depending on the complexity or specificity of the question, an additional chain-of-thought (CoT) prompt may need to be added to the initial prompt in order to provide further clarification and guidance to the LLM. The CoT prompt is designed to walk the LLM through the logical steps of reasoning and thinking that are required to properly understand the question and formulate a response. It lays out a type of internal monologue or cognitive path for the LLM to follow in order to comprehend the key information within the question, determine what kind of response is needed, and construct that response in an appropriate and accurate way. We use the following CoT prompt for this use case:

"""
Context below includes a few paragraphs from draft RFP and RFI response documents:

Context: {context}

Question: {question}

Think step by step:

1- Find all the paragraphs in the context that are relevant to the question.
2- Sort the paragraphs by release date.
3- Use the paragraphs to answer the question.

Note: Pay attention to the updated information based on the release dates.
"""

5. The prompt is passed to an LLM on Amazon Bedrock to generate a response in natural language. We use the following inference configuration for the Anthropic Claude V2 model on Amazon Bedrock. The Temperature parameter is usually set to zero for reproducibility and also to prevent LLM hallucination. For regular RAG applications, top_k and top_p are usually set to 250 and 1, respectively. Set max_tokens_to_sample to maximum number of tokens expected to be generated (1 token is approximately 3/4 of a word). See Inference parameters for more details.

{
    "temperature": 0,
    "top_k": 250,
    "top_p": 1,
    "max_tokens_to_sample": 300,
    "stop_sequences": [“nnHuman:nn”]
}

Example use case

As a demonstration, we describe an example of Q&A on two related documents: a draft RFP document in PDF format with 167 pages, and an RFI response document in PDF format with 6 pages released later, which includes additional information and updates to the draft RFP.

The following is an example question asking if the project size requirements have changed, given the draft RFP and RFI response documents:

Have the original scoring evaluations changed? if yes, what are the new project sizes?

The following figure shows the relevant sections of the draft RFP document that contain the answers.

The following figure shows the relevant sections of the RFI response document that contain the answers.

For the LLM to generate the correct response, the retrieved context from OpenSearch Service should contain the tables shown in the preceding figures, and the LLM should be able to infer the order of the retrieved contents from metadata, such as release dates, and generate a readable response in natural language.

The following are the data ingestion steps:

1. The draft RFP and RFI response documents are uploaded to Amazon Textract to extract text and tables as the content. Additionally, we used regular expression to identify document sections and table of contents (see the following figures, respectively). The table of contents can be removed for this use case because it doesn’t have any relevant information.
   
   
2. We split each document section independently into smaller chunks with some overlaps. For this use case, we used a chunk size of 500 tokens with the overlap size of 100 tokens (1 token is approximately 3/4 a word). We used a BPE tokenizer, where each token corresponds to about 4 bytes.
3. An embedding representation of each text chunk is obtained using the Amazon Titan Embeddings G1 – Text v1.2 model on Amazon Bedrock.
4. Each text chunk is stored into an OpenSearch Service index along with metadata such as section name and document release date.

The Q&A steps are as follows:

1. The input question is first transformed to a numeric vector using the embedding model. The vector representation used for semantic search and retrieval of relevant context in the next step.
2. The top K relevant text chunk and metadata are retrieved from OpenSearch Service.
3. The opensearch_result_to_context function and the prompt template (defined earlier) are used to create the prompt given the input question and retrieved context.
4. The prompt is sent to the LLM on Amazon Bedrock to generate a response in natural language. The following is the response generated by Anthropic Claude v2, which matched with the information presented in the draft RFP and RFI response documents. The question was “Have the original scoring evaluations changed? If yes, what are the new project sizes?” Using CoT prompting, the model can correctly answer the question.

Key features

The solution contains the following key features:

• Section-aware chunking – Identify document sections and split each section independently into smaller chunks with some overlaps to optimize data ingestion.
• Table to CSV transformation – Convert tables extracted by Amazon Textract into CSV format to improve the language model’s ability to comprehend and answer questions about tables.
• Adding metadata to index – Store metadata such as section name and document release date along with text chunks in the OpenSearch Service index. This allowed the language model to identify the most up-to-date or relevant information.
• CoT prompt – Design a chain-of-thought prompt to provide further clarification and guidance to the language model on the logical steps needed to properly understand the question and formulate an accurate response.

These contributions helped improve the accuracy and capabilities of the solution for answering questions about documents. In fact, based on Deltek’s subject matter experts’ evaluations of LLM-generated responses, the solution achieved a 96% overall accuracy rate.

Conclusion

This post outlined an application of generative AI for question answering across multiple government solicitation documents. The solution discussed was a simplified presentation of a pipeline developed by the AWS GenAIIC team in collaboration with Deltek. We described an approach to enable Q&A on lengthy documents published separately over time. Using Amazon Bedrock and OpenSearch Service, this RAG architecture can scale for enterprise-level document volumes. Additionally, a prompt template was shared that uses CoT logic to guide the LLM in producing accurate responses to user questions. Although this solution is simplified, this post aimed to provide a high-level overview of a real-world generative AI solution for streamlining review of complex proposal documents and their iterations.

Deltek is actively refining and optimizing this solution to ensure it meets their unique needs. This includes expanding support for file formats other than PDF, as well as adopting more cost-efficient strategies for their data ingestion pipeline.

Learn more about prompt engineering and generative AI-powered Q&A in the Amazon Bedrock Workshop. For technical support or to contact AWS generative AI specialists, visit the GenAIIC webpage.

Resources

To learn more about Amazon Bedrock, see the following resources:

• Amazon Bedrock Workshop
• Amazon Bedrock User Guide

To learn more about OpenSearch Service, see the following resources:

• Amazon OpenSearch Service Documentation
• Amazon OpenSearch Workshop

See the following links for RAG resources on AWS:

• Retrieval augmented generation (RAG)
• Knowledge Bases for Amazon Bedrock

About the Authors

Kevin Plexico is Senior Vice President of Information Solutions at Deltek, where he oversees research, analysis, and specification creation for clients in the Government Contracting and AEC industries. He leads the delivery of GovWin IQ, providing essential government market intelligence to over 5,000 clients, and manages the industry’s largest team of analysts in this sector. Kevin also heads Deltek’s Specification Solutions products, producing premier construction specification content including MasterSpec® for the AIA and SpecText.

Shakun Vohra is a distinguished technology leader with over 20 years of expertise in Software Engineering, AI/ML, Business Transformation, and Data Optimization. At Deltek, he has driven significant growth, leading diverse, high-performing teams across multiple continents. Shakun excels in aligning technology strategies with corporate goals, collaborating with executives to shape organizational direction. Renowned for his strategic vision and mentorship, he has consistently fostered the development of next-generation leaders and transformative technological solutions.

Amin Tajgardoon is an Applied Scientist at the AWS Generative AI Innovation Center. He has an extensive background in computer science and machine learning. In particular, Amin’s focus has been on deep learning and forecasting, prediction explanation methods, model drift detection, probabilistic generative models, and applications of AI in the healthcare domain.

Anila Joshi has more than a decade of experience building AI solutions. As an Applied Science Manager at AWS Generative AI Innovation Center, Anila pioneers innovative applications of AI that push the boundaries of possibility and accelerate the adoption of AWS services with customers by helping customers ideate, identify, and implement secure generative AI solutions.

Yash Shah and his team of scientists, specialists and engineers at AWS Generative AI Innovation Center, work with some of AWS most strategic customers on helping them realize art of the possible with Generative AI by driving business value. Yash has been with Amazon for more than 7.5 years now and has worked with customers across healthcare, sports, manufacturing and software across multiple geographic regions.

Jordan Cook is an accomplished AWS Sr. Account Manager with nearly two decades of experience in the technology industry, specializing in sales and data center strategy. Jordan leverages his extensive knowledge of Amazon Web Services and deep understanding of cloud computing to provide tailored solutions that enable businesses to optimize their cloud infrastructure, enhance operational efficiency, and drive innovation.

Read More

This post is co-authored with Travis Mehlinger and Karthik Raghunathan from Cisco.

Webex by Cisco is a leading provider of cloud-based collaboration solutions which includes video meetings, calling, messaging, events, polling, asynchronous video and customer experience solutions like contact center and purpose-built collaboration devices. Webex’s focus on delivering inclusive collaboration experiences fuels our innovation, which leverages AI and Machine Learning, to remove the barriers of geography, language, personality, and familiarity with technology. Its solutions are underpinned with security and privacy by design. Webex works with the world’s leading business and productivity apps – including AWS.

Cisco’s Webex AI (WxAI) team plays a crucial role in enhancing these products with AI-driven features and functionalities, leveraging LLMs to improve user productivity and experiences. In the past year, the team has increasingly focused on building artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities powered by large language models (LLMs) to improve productivity and experience for users. Notably, the team’s work extends to Webex Contact Center, a cloud-based omni-channel contact center solution that empowers organizations to deliver exceptional customer experiences. By integrating LLMs, WxAI team enables advanced capabilities such as intelligent virtual assistants, natural language processing, and sentiment analysis, allowing Webex Contact Center to provide more personalized and efficient customer support. However, as these LLM models grew to contain hundreds of gigabytes of data, WxAI team faced challenges in efficiently allocating resources and starting applications with the embedded models. To optimize its AI/ML infrastructure, Cisco migrated its LLMs to Amazon SageMaker Inference, improving speed, scalability, and price-performance.

This blog post highlights how Cisco implemented faster autoscaling release reference. For more details on Cisco’s Use Cases, Solution & Benefits see How Cisco accelerated the use of generative AI with Amazon SageMaker Inference.

In this post, we will discuss the following:

1. Overview of Cisco’s use-case and architecture
2. Introduce new faster autoscaling feature
   1. Single Model real-time endpoint
   2. Deployment using Amazon SageMaker InferenceComponents
3. Share results on the performance improvements Cisco saw with faster autoscaling feature for GenAI inference
4. Next Steps

Cisco’s Use-case: Enhancing Contact Center Experiences

Webex is applying generative AI to its contact center solutions, enabling more natural, human-like conversations between customers and agents. The AI can generate contextual, empathetic responses to customer inquiries, as well as automatically draft personalized emails and chat messages. This helps contact center agents work more efficiently while maintaining a high level of customer service.

Architecture

Initially, WxAI embedded LLM models directly into the application container images running on Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS). However, as the models grew larger and more complex, this approach faced significant scalability and resource utilization challenges. Operating the resource-intensive LLMs through the applications required provisioning substantial compute resources, which slowed down processes like allocating resources and starting applications. This inefficiency hampered WxAI’s ability to rapidly develop, test, and deploy new AI-powered features for the Webex portfolio.

To address these challenges, WxAI team turned to SageMaker Inference – a fully managed AI inference service that allows seamless deployment and scaling of models independently from the applications that use them. By decoupling the LLM hosting from the Webex applications, WxAI could provision the necessary compute resources for the models without impacting the core collaboration and communication capabilities.

“The applications and the models work and scale fundamentally differently, with entirely different cost considerations, by separating them rather than lumping them together, it’s much simpler to solve issues independently.”

– Travis Mehlinger, Principal Engineer at Cisco. 

This architectural shift has enabled Webex to harness the power of generative AI across its suite of collaboration and customer engagement solutions.

Today Sagemaker endpoint uses autoscaling with invocation per instance. However, it takes ~6 minutes to detect need for autoscaling.

Introducing new Predefined metric types for faster autoscaling

Cisco Webex AI team wanted to improve their inference auto scaling times, so they worked with Amazon SageMaker to improve inference.

Amazon SageMaker’s real-time inference endpoint offers a scalable, managed solution for hosting Generative AI models. This versatile resource can accommodate multiple instances, serving one or more deployed models for instant predictions. Customers have the flexibility to deploy either a single model or multiple models using SageMaker InferenceComponents on the same endpoint. This approach allows for efficient handling of diverse workloads and cost-effective scaling.

To optimize real-time inference workloads, SageMaker employs application automatic scaling (auto scaling). This feature dynamically adjusts both the number of instances in use and the quantity of model copies deployed (when using inference components), responding to real-time changes in demand. When traffic to the endpoint surpasses a predefined threshold, auto scaling increases the available instances and deploys additional model copies to meet the heightened demand. Conversely, as workloads decrease, the system automatically removes unnecessary instances and model copies, effectively reducing costs. This adaptive scaling ensures that resources are optimally utilized, balancing performance needs with cost considerations in real-time.

Working with Cisco, Amazon SageMaker releases new sub-minute high-resolution pre-defined metric type SageMakerVariantConcurrentRequestsPerModelHighResolution for faster autoscaling and reduced detection time. This newer high-resolution metric has shown to reduce scaling detection times by up to 6x (compared to existing SageMakerVariantInvocationsPerInstance metric) and thereby improving overall end-to-end inference latency by up to 50%, on endpoints hosting Generative AI models like Llama3-8B.

With this new release, SageMaker real-time endpoints also now emits new ConcurrentRequestsPerModel and ConcurrentRequestsPerModelCopy CloudWatch metrics as well, which are more suited for monitoring and scaling Amazon SageMaker endpoints hosting LLMs and FMs.

Cisco’s Evaluation of faster autoscaling feature for GenAI inference

Cisco evaluated Amazon SageMaker’s new pre-defined metric types for faster autoscaling on their Generative AI workloads. They observed up to a 50% latency improvement in end-to-end inference latency by using the new SageMakerequestsPerModelHighResolution metric, compared to the existing SageMakerVariantInvocationsPerInstance  metric.

The setup involved using their Generative AI models, on SageMaker’s real-time inference endpoints. SageMaker’s autoscaling feature dynamically adjusted both the number of instances and the quantity of model copies deployed to meet real-time changes in demand. The new high-resolution SageMakerVariantConcurrentRequestsPerModelHighResolution metric reduced scaling detection times by up to 6x, enabling faster autoscaling and lower latency.

In addition, SageMaker now emits new CloudWatch metrics, including ConcurrentRequestsPerModel and ConcurrentRequestsPerModelCopy, which are better suited for monitoring and scaling endpoints hosting large language models (LLMs) and foundation models (FMs). This enhanced autoscaling capability has been a game-changer for Cisco, helping to improve the performance and efficiency of their critical Generative AI applications.

“We are really pleased with the performance improvements we’ve seen from Amazon SageMaker’s new autoscaling metrics. The higher-resolution scaling metrics have significantly reduced latency during initial load and scale-out on our Gen AI workloads. We’re excited to do a broader rollout of this feature across our infrastructure”

– Travis Mehlinger, Principal Engineer at Cisco.

Cisco further plans to work with SageMaker inference to drive improvements in rest of the variables that impact autoscaling latencies. Like model download and load times.

Conclusion

Cisco’s Webex AI team is continuing to leverage Amazon SageMaker Inference to power generative AI experiences across its Webex portfolio. Evaluation with faster autoscaling from SageMaker has shown Cisco up to 50% latency improvements in its GenAI inference endpoints. As WxAI team continues to push the boundaries of AI-driven collaboration, its partnership with Amazon SageMaker will be crucial in informing upcoming improvements and advanced GenAI inference capabilities. With this new feature Cisco looks forward to further optimizing its AI Inference performance by rolling it broadly in multiple regions and delivering even more impactful generative AI features to its customers.

About the Authors

Travis Mehlinger is a Principal Software Engineer in the Webex Collaboration AI group, where he helps teams develop and operate cloud-native AI and ML capabilities to support Webex AI features for customers around the world.In his spare time, Travis enjoys cooking barbecue, playing video games, and traveling around the US and UK to race go karts.

Karthik Raghunathan is the Senior Director for Speech, Language, and Video AI in the Webex Collaboration AI Group. He leads a multidisciplinary team of software engineers, machine learning engineers, data scientists, computational linguists, and designers who develop advanced AI-driven features for the Webex collaboration portfolio. Prior to Cisco, Karthik held research positions at MindMeld (acquired by Cisco), Microsoft, and Stanford University.

Praveen Chamarthi is a Senior AI/ML Specialist with Amazon Web Services. He is passionate about AI/ML and all things AWS. He helps customers across the Americas to scale, innovate, and operate ML workloads efficiently on AWS. In his spare time, Praveen loves to read and enjoys sci-fi movies.

Saurabh Trikande is a Senior Product Manager for Amazon SageMaker Inference. He is passionate about working with customers and is motivated by the goal of democratizing AI. He focuses on core challenges related to deploying complex AI applications, multi-tenant models, cost optimizations, and making deployment of Generative AI models more accessible. In his spare time, Saurabh enjoys hiking, learning about innovative technologies, following TechCrunch and spending time with his family.

Ravi Thakur is a Sr Solutions Architect Supporting Strategic Industries at AWS, and is based out of Charlotte, NC. His career spans diverse industry verticals, including banking, automotive, telecommunications, insurance, and energy. Ravi’s expertise shines through his dedication to solving intricate business challenges on behalf of customers, utilizing distributed, cloud-native, and well-architected design patterns. His proficiency extends to microservices, containerization, AI/ML, Generative AI, and more. Today, Ravi empowers AWS Strategic Customers on personalized digital transformation journeys, leveraging his proven ability to deliver concrete, bottom-line benefits.

Read More

This post is co-authored with Travis Mehlinger and Karthik Raghunathan from Cisco.

Webex by Cisco is a leading provider of cloud-based collaboration solutions, including video meetings, calling, messaging, events, polling, asynchronous video, and customer experience solutions like contact center and purpose-built collaboration devices. Webex’s focus on delivering inclusive collaboration experiences fuels their innovation, which uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), to remove the barriers of geography, language, personality, and familiarity with technology. Its solutions are underpinned with security and privacy by design. Webex works with the world’s leading business and productivity apps—including AWS.

Cisco’s Webex AI (WxAI) team plays a crucial role in enhancing these products with AI-driven features and functionalities, using large language models (LLMs) to improve user productivity and experiences. In the past year, the team has increasingly focused on building AI capabilities powered by LLMs to improve productivity and experience for users. Notably, the team’s work extends to Webex Contact Center, a cloud-based omni-channel contact center solution that empowers organizations to deliver exceptional customer experiences. By integrating LLMs, the WxAI team enables advanced capabilities such as intelligent virtual assistants, natural language processing (NLP), and sentiment analysis, allowing Webex Contact Center to provide more personalized and efficient customer support. However, as these LLM models grew to contain hundreds of gigabytes of data, the WxAI team faced challenges in efficiently allocating resources and starting applications with the embedded models. To optimize its AI/ML infrastructure, Cisco migrated its LLMs to Amazon SageMaker Inference, improving speed, scalability, and price-performance.

This post highlights how Cisco implemented new functionalities and migrated existing workloads to Amazon SageMaker inference components for their industry-specific contact center use cases. By integrating generative AI, they can now analyze call transcripts to better understand customer pain points and improve agent productivity. Cisco has also implemented conversational AI experiences, including chatbots and virtual agents that can generate human-like responses, to automate personalized communications based on customer context. Additionally, they are using generative AI to extract key call drivers, optimize agent workflows, and gain deeper insights into customer sentiment. Cisco’s adoption of SageMaker Inference has enabled them to streamline their contact center operations and provide more satisfying, personalized interactions that address customer needs.

In this post, we discuss the following:

• Cisco’s business use cases and outcomes
• How Cisco accelerated the use of generative AI powered by LLMs for their contact center use cases with the help of SageMaker Inference
• Cisco’s generative AI inference architecture, which is built as a robust and secure foundation, using various services and features such as SageMaker Inference, Amazon Bedrock, Kubernetes, Prometheus, Grafana, and more
• How Cisco uses an LLM router and auto scaling to route requests to appropriate LLMs for different tasks while simultaneously scaling their models for resiliency and performance efficiency.
• How the solutions in this post impacted Cisco’s business roadmap and strategic partnership with AWS
• How Cisco helped SageMaker Inference build new capabilities to deploy generative AI applications at scale

Enhancing collaboration and customer engagement with generative AI: Webex’s AI-powered solutions

In this section, we discuss Cisco’s AI-powered use cases.

Meeting summaries and insights

For Webex Meetings, the platform uses generative AI to automatically summarize meeting recordings and transcripts. This extracts the key takeaways and action items, helping distributed teams stay informed even if they missed a live session. The AI-generated summaries provide a concise overview of important discussions and decisions, allowing employees to quickly get up to speed. Beyond summaries, Webex’s generative AI capabilities also surface intelligent insights from meeting content. This includes identifying action items, highlighting critical decisions, and generating personalized meeting notes and to-do lists for each participant. These insights help make meetings more productive and hold attendees accountable.

Enhancing contact center experiences

Webex is also applying generative AI to its contact center solutions, enabling more natural, human-like conversations between customers and agents. The AI can generate contextual, empathetic responses to customer inquiries, as well as automatically draft personalized emails and chat messages. This helps contact center agents work more efficiently while maintaining a high level of customer service.

Webex customers realize positive outcomes with generative AI

Webex’s adoption of generative AI is driving tangible benefits for customers. Clients using the platform’s AI-powered meeting summaries and insights have reported productivity gains. Webex customers using the platform’s generative AI for contact centers have handled hundreds of thousands of calls with improved customer satisfaction and reduced handle times, enabling more natural, empathetic conversations between agents and clients. Webex’s strategic integration of generative AI is empowering users to work smarter and deliver exceptional experiences.

For more details on how Webex is harnessing generative AI to enhance collaboration and customer engagement, see Webex | Exceptional Experiences for Every Interaction on the Webex blog.

Using SageMaker Inference to optimize resources for Cisco

Cisco’s WxAI team is dedicated to delivering advanced collaboration experiences powered by cutting-edge ML. The team develops a comprehensive suite of AI and ML features for the Webex ecosystem, including audio intelligence capabilities like noise removal and optimizing speaker voices, language intelligence for transcription and translation, and video intelligence features like virtual backgrounds. At the forefront of WxAI’s innovations is the AI-powered Webex Assistant, a virtual assistant that provides voice-activated control and seamless meeting support in multiple languages. To build these sophisticated capabilities, WxAI uses LLMs, which can contain up to hundreds of gigabytes of training data.

Initially, WxAI embedded LLM models directly into the application container images running on Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS). However, as the models grew larger and more complex, this approach faced significant scalability and resource utilization challenges. Operating the resource-intensive LLMs through the applications required provisioning substantial compute resources, which slowed down processes like allocating resources and starting applications. This inefficiency hampered WxAI’s ability to rapidly develop, test, and deploy new AI-powered features for the Webex portfolio. To address these challenges, the WxAI team turned to SageMaker Inference—a fully managed AI inference service that allows seamless deployment and scaling of models independently from the applications that use them. By decoupling the LLM hosting from the Webex applications, WxAI could provision the necessary compute resources for the models without impacting the core collaboration and communication capabilities.

 “The applications and the models work and scale fundamentally differently, with entirely different cost considerations; by separating them rather than lumping them together, it’s much simpler to solve issues independently.”

– Travis Mehlinger, Principal Engineer at Cisco.

This architectural shift has enabled Webex to harness the power of generative AI across its suite of collaboration and customer engagement solutions.

Solution overview: Improving efficiency and reducing costs by migrating to SageMaker Inference

To address the scalability and resource utilization challenges faced with embedding LLMs directly into their applications, the WxAI team migrated to SageMaker Inference. By taking advantage of this fully managed service for deploying LLMs, Cisco unlocked significant performance and cost-optimization opportunities. Key benefits include the ability to deploy multiple LLMs behind a single endpoint for faster scaling and improved response latencies, as well as cost savings. Additionally, the WxAI team implemented an LLM proxy to simplify access to LLMs for Webex teams, enable centralized data collection, and reduce operational overhead. With SageMaker Inference, Cisco can efficiently manage and scale their LLM deployments, harnessing the power of generative AI across the Webex portfolio while maintaining optimal performance, scalability, and cost-effectiveness.

The following diagram illustrates the WxAI architecture on AWS.

The architecture is built on a robust and secure AWS foundation:

• The architecture uses AWS services like Application Load Balancer, AWS WAF, and EKS clusters for seamless ingress, threat mitigation, and containerized workload management.
• The LLM proxy (a microservice deployed on an EKS pod as part of the Service VPC) simplifies the integration of LLMs for Webex teams, providing a streamlined interface and reducing operational overhead. The LLM proxy supports LLM deployments on SageMaker Inference, Amazon Bedrock, or other LLM providers for Webex teams.
• The architecture uses SageMaker Inference for optimized model deployment, auto scaling, and routing mechanisms.
• The system integrates Loki for logging, Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus for metrics, and Grafana for unified visualization, seamlessly integrated with Cisco SSO.
• The Data VPC houses the data layer components, including Amazon ElastiCache for caching and Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) for database services, providing efficient data access and management.

Use case overview: Contact center topic analytics

A key focus area for the WxAI team is to enhance the capabilities of the Webex Contact Center platform. A typical Webex Contact Center installation has hundreds of agents handling many interactions through various channels like phone calls and digital channels. Webex’s AI-powered Topic Analytics feature extracts the key reasons customers are calling about by analyzing aggregated historical interactions and clustering them into meaningful topic categories, as shown in the following screenshot. The contact center administrator can then use these insights to optimize operations, enhance agent performance, and ultimately deliver a more satisfactory customer experience.

The Topic Analytics feature is powered by a pipeline of three models: a call driver extraction model, a topic clustering model, and a topic labeling model, as illustrated in the following diagram.

The model details are as follows:

• Call driver extraction – This generative model summarizes the primary reason or intent (referred to as the call driver) behind a customer’s call. Accurate automatic tagging of calls with call drivers helps contact center supervisors and administrators quickly understand the primary reason for any historical call. One of the key considerations when solving this problem was selecting the right model to balance quality and operational costs. The WxAI team chose the FLAN T5 model on SageMaker Inference and instruction fine-tuned it for extracting call drivers from call transcripts. FLAN-T5 is a powerful text-to-text transfer transformer model that performs various natural language understanding and generation tasks. This workload had a global footprint deployed in us-east-2, eu-west-2, eu-central-1, ap-southeast-1, ap-southeast-2, ap-northeast-1, and ca-central-1 AWS
• Topic clustering – Although automatically tagging every contact center interaction with its call driver is a useful feature in itself, analyzing these call drivers in an aggregated fashion over a large batch of calls can uncover even more interesting trends and insights. The topic clustering model achieves this by clustering all the individually extracted call drivers from a large batch of calls into different topic clusters. It does this by creating a semantic embedding for each call driver and employing an unsupervised hierarchical clustering technique that operates on the vector embeddings. This results in distinct and coherent topic clusters where semantically similar call drivers are grouped together.
• Topic labeling – The topic labeling model is a generative model that creates a descriptive name to serve as the label for each topic cluster. Several LLMs were prompt-tuned and evaluated in a few-shot setting to choose the ideal model for the label generation task. Finally, Llama2-13b-chat, with its ability to better capture contextual nuances and semantics of natural language conversation, was used for its accuracy, performance, and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, Llama2-13b-chat was deployed and used on SageMaker inference components, while maintaining relatively low operating costs compared to other LLMs, by using specific hardware like g4dn and g5

This solution also used the auto scaling capabilities of SageMaker to dynamically adjust the number of instances based on a desired minimum of 1 endpoint and maximum of 30. This approach provides efficient resource utilization while maintaining high throughput, allowing the WxAI platform to handle batch jobs overnight and scale to hundreds of inferences per minute during peak hours. By deploying the model on SageMaker Inference with auto scaling, WxAI team was able to deliver reliable and accurate responses to customer interactions for their Topic Analytics use case.

By accurately pinpointing the call driver, the system can suggest appropriate actions, resources, and next steps to the agent, streamlining the customer support process, further leading to personalized and accurate responses to customer questions.

To handle fluctuating demand and optimize resource utilization, the WxAI team implemented auto scaling for their SageMaker Inference endpoints. They configured the endpoints to scale from a minimum to a maximum instance count based on GPU utilization. Additionally, the LLM proxy routed requests between the different LLMs deployed on SageMaker Inference. This proxy abstracts the complexities of communicating with various LLM providers and enables centralized data collection and analysis. This led to enhanced generative AI workflows, optimized latency, and personalized use case implementations.

Benefits

Through the strategic adoption of AWS AI services, Cisco’s WxAI team has realized significant benefits, enabling them to build cutting-edge, AI-powered collaboration capabilities more rapidly and cost-effectively:

• Improved development and deployment cycle time – By decoupling models from applications, the team has streamlined processes like bug fixes, integration testing, and feature rollouts across environments, accelerating their overall development velocity.
• Simplified engineering and delivery – The clear separation of concerns between the lean application layer and resource-intensive model layer has simplified engineering efforts and delivery, allowing the team to focus on innovation rather than infrastructure complexities.
• Reduced costs – By using fully managed services like SageMaker Inference, the team has offloaded infrastructure management overhead. Additionally, capabilities like asynchronous inference and multi-model endpoints have enabled significant cost optimization without compromising performance or availability.
• Scalability and performance – Services like SageMaker Inference and Amazon Bedrock, combined with technologies like NVIDIA Triton Inference Server on SageMaker, have empowered the WxAI team to scale their AI/ML workloads reliably and deliver high-performance inference for demanding use cases.
• Accelerated innovation – The partnership with AWS has given the WxAI team access to cutting-edge AI services and expertise, enabling them to rapidly prototype and deploy innovative capabilities like the AI-powered Webex Assistant and advanced contact center AI features.

Cisco’s contributions to SageMaker Inference: Enhancing generative AI inference capabilities

Building upon the success of their strategic migration to SageMaker Inference, Cisco has been instrumental in partnering with the SageMaker Inference team to build and enhance key generative AI capabilities within the SageMaker platform. Since the early days of generative AI, Cisco has provided the SageMaker Inference team with valuable inputs and expertise, enabling the introduction of several new features and optimizations:

• Cost and performance optimizations for generative AI inference – Cisco helped the SageMaker Inference team develop innovative techniques to optimize the use of accelerators, enabling SageMaker Inference to reduce foundation model (ML) deployment costs by 50% on average and latency by 20% on average with inference components. This breakthrough delivers significant cost savings and performance improvements for customers running generative AI workloads on SageMaker.
• Scaling improvements for generative AI inference – Cisco’s expertise in distributed systems and auto scaling has also helped the SageMaker team develop advanced capabilities to better handle the scaling requirements of generative AI models. These improvements reduce auto scaling times by up to 40% and auto scaling detection by 6 times, so customers can rapidly scale their generative AI workloads on SageMaker to meet spikes in demand without compromising performance.
• Streamlined generative AI model deployment for inference – Recognizing the need for simplified generative AI model deployment, Cisco collaborated with AWS to introduce the ability to deploy open source LLMs and FMs with just a few clicks. This user-friendly functionality removes the complexity traditionally associated with deploying these advanced models, empowering more customers to harness the power of generative AI.
• Simplified inference deployment for Kubernetes customers – Cisco’s deep expertise in Kubernetes and container technologies helped the SageMaker team develop new Kubernetes Operator-based inference capabilities. These innovations make it straightforward for customers running applications on Kubernetes to deploy and manage generative AI models, reducing LLM deployment costs by 50% on average.
• Using NVIDIA Triton Inference Server for generative AI – Cisco worked with AWS to integrate the NVIDIA Triton Inference Server, a high-performance model serving container managed by SageMaker, to power generative AI inference on SageMaker Inference. This enabled the WxAI team to scale their AI/ML workloads reliably and deliver high-performance inference for demanding generative AI use cases.
• Packaging generative AI models more efficiently – To further simplify the generative AI model lifecycle, Cisco worked with AWS to enhance the capabilities in SageMaker for packaging LLMs and FMs for deployment. These improvements make it straightforward to prepare and deploy these generative AI models, accelerating their adoption and integration.
• Improved documentation for generative AI – Recognizing the importance of comprehensive documentation to support the growing generative AI ecosystem, Cisco collaborated with the AWS team to enhance the SageMaker documentation. This includes detailed guides, best practices, and reference materials tailored specifically for generative AI use cases, helping customers quickly ramp up their generative AI initiatives on the SageMaker platform.

By closely partnering with the SageMaker Inference team, Cisco has played a pivotal role in driving the rapid evolution of generative AI Inference capabilities in SageMaker. The features and optimizations introduced through this collaboration are empowering AWS customers to unlock the transformative potential of generative AI with greater ease, cost-effectiveness, and performance.

“Our partnership with the SageMaker Inference product team goes back to the early days of generative AI, and we believe the features we have built in collaboration, from cost optimizations to high-performance model deployment, will broadly help other enterprises rapidly adopt and scale generative AI workloads on SageMaker, unlocking new frontiers of innovation and business transformation.”

– Travis Mehlinger, Principal Engineer at Cisco.

Conclusion

By using AWS services like SageMaker Inference and Amazon Bedrock for generative AI, Cisco’s WxAI team has been able to optimize their AI/ML infrastructure, enabling them to build and deploy AI-powered features more efficiently, reliably, and cost-effectively. This strategic approach has unlocked significant benefits for Cisco in deploying and scaling its generative AI capabilities for the Webex platform. Cisco’s own journey with generative AI, as showcased in this post, offers valuable lessons and insights for other uses of SageMaker Inference.

Recognizing the impact of generative AI, Cisco has played a crucial role in shaping the future of these capabilities within SageMaker Inference. By providing valuable insights and hands-on collaboration, Cisco has helped AWS develop a range of powerful features that are making generative AI more accessible and scalable for organizations. From optimizing infrastructure costs and performance to streamlining model deployment and scaling, Cisco’s contributions have been instrumental in enhancing the SageMaker Inference service.

Moving forward, the Cisco-AWS partnership aims to drive further advancements in areas like conversational and generative AI inference. As generative AI adoption accelerates across industries, Cisco’s Webex platform is designed to scale and streamline user experiences through various use cases discussed in this post and beyond. You can expect to see ongoing innovation from this collaboration in SageMaker Inference capabilities, as Cisco and SageMaker Inference continue to push the boundaries of what’s possible in the world of AI.

For more information on Webex Contact Center’s Topic Analytics feature and related AI capabilities, refer to The Webex Advantage: Navigating Customer Experience in the Age of AI on the Webex blog.

About the Authors

Travis Mehlinger is a Principal Software Engineer in the Webex Collaboration AI group, where he helps teams develop and operate cloud-centered AI and ML capabilities to support Webex AI features for customers around the world. In his spare time, Travis enjoys cooking barbecue, playing video games, and traveling around the US and UK to race go-karts.

Karthik Raghunathan is the Senior Director for Speech, Language, and Video AI in the Webex Collaboration AI Group. He leads a multidisciplinary team of software engineers, machine learning engineers, data scientists, computational linguists, and designers who develop advanced AI-driven features for the Webex collaboration portfolio. Prior to Cisco, Karthik held research positions at MindMeld (acquired by Cisco), Microsoft, and Stanford University.

Saurabh Trikande is a Senior Product Manager for Amazon SageMaker Inference. He is passionate about working with customers and is motivated by the goal of democratizing machine learning. He focuses on core challenges related to deploying complex ML applications, multi-tenant ML models, cost optimizations, and making deployment of deep learning models more accessible. In his spare time, Saurabh enjoys hiking, learning about innovative technologies, following TechCrunch and spending time with his family.

Ravi Thakur is a Senior Solutions Architect at AWS, based in Charlotte, NC. He specializes in solving complex business challenges using distributed, cloud-centered, and well-architected patterns. Ravi’s expertise includes microservices, containerization, AI/ML, and generative AI. He empowers AWS strategic customers on digital transformation journeys, delivering bottom-line benefits. In his spare time, Ravi enjoys motorcycle rides, family time, reading, movies, and traveling.

Amit Arora is an AI and ML Specialist Architect at Amazon Web Services, helping enterprise customers use cloud-based machine learning services to rapidly scale their innovations. He is also an adjunct lecturer in the MS data science and analytics program at Georgetown University in Washington D.C.

Madhur Prashant is an AI and ML Solutions Architect at Amazon Web Services. He is passionate about the intersection of human thinking and generative AI. His interests lie in generative AI, specifically building solutions that are helpful and harmless, and most of all optimal for customers. Outside of work, he loves doing yoga, hiking, spending time with his twin, and playing the guitar.

Read More